Re: [Az-Geocaching] Stats?

see your problem isn't the reservations :)... it must lay elsewhere....
----- Original Message -----
From: Gale Draper
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Stats?


Yes, 100% Navajo.

  Regan L Smith <buggers@mindspring.com> wrote: 
    umm I maybe wrong but does Mike have Indian blood???
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Gale Draper 
      To: listserv@azgeocaching.com 
      Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 3:50 PM
      Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Stats?

      I think mine are moving at a larger rate than some of the rest of you since we have dropped about half a dozen places in the rankings. None of our caches are south of Tucson, nor are any on Indian land so that kinda blows those "theories" out of the water.

      Brian Casteel <bcasteel@cox.net> wrote: 
        Ok, now I'm really curious.  It almost appears that with each passing day, more and more caches are moving from in-state to OOS finds.  Did someone give part of us back to Mexico, or is something borked in the data retrieval?

        Brian
        Team A.I.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Do you Yahoo!?
      The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search

Tsegi Mike and Desert Viking

  Till a voice, as bad as Conscience, rang interminable changes
    On one everlasting Whisper day and night repeated -- so:
  "Something hidden.  Go and find it. Go and look behind the Ranges --
    "Something lost behind the Ranges. Lost and waiting for you. Go!"

Rudyard Kipling , The Explorer 1898


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search