Re: [Az-Geocaching] Re: Why very few new caches lately in

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
+ (text/html)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Gale Draper
Date:  
To: listserv
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Re: Why very few new caches lately in
Can we vote on this?

We vote "yes" to retroactive offer.

Scott Sparks <> wrote:
Sorry, my challenge isn't retroactive. ;-)

-- Sprocket

>Sprocket,
> Looks like you were nailed on a technicality. Also you are three years
>overdue for hiding an additional 20 caches, come on lets see them.
>Hahahaha. Me curiosity has been juggled a bit though, were was the first AZ
>geocache? Someone has to know.
>
>~Eric
>Crazyebay
>
>
>
>
>>>From: Bob Renner
>>>Reply-To:
>>>To:
>>>Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Re: Why very few new caches lately in
>>>Arizona?]
>>>Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 06:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
>>>
>>>Sprocket,
>>>
>>>Actually, that condition has happened. Three teams
>>>have the honor of finding ALL caches in the state of
>>>Arizona. Bob Renner, stevek, and Gravatite all
>>>accomplished this feat between 9/9/2000 and 10/8/2000.
>>>
>>>There was only 1 cache in Arizona then so it was a
>>>little easier then.
>>>
>>>Just thought I'd throw in a little levity to the
>>>thread.
>>>
>>>Bob
>>



____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching

Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com

Tsegi Mike and Desert Viking

Till a voice, as bad as Conscience, rang interminable changes
On one everlasting Whisper day and night repeated -- so:
"Something hidden. Go and find it. Go and look behind the Ranges --
"Something lost behind the Ranges. Lost and waiting for you. Go!"



Rudyard Kipling , The Explorer 1898



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software