RE: [Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why very few new caches lately in A…

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
+ (text/html)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Mimi Philpott
Date:  
To: listserv
Subject: RE: [Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why very few new caches lately in Arizona?]
or Murphey's
-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com]On Behalf Of Gale
Draper
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 4:27 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why very few new caches lately in
Arizona?]


PLace one at Gurley Street Grill and I'm there.

  Regan L Smith <> wrote:
    a better idea let's all carpool with ken and place a cache under every
park
    bench in Prescott!!!!!!!!!!




    Think people I rather have quality that quantity just placing a cache to
    get a find is not a reason to place a cache, I also feel that until you
have
    found a minimum of 50 percent of the caches placed in the state, don't
    bemoan the point and waste your time which could be better spent on
finding
    all those caches that people do place under a park bench and not say on
top
    of a hill with a slight cave...





    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Ford, Denny"
    To:
    Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 2:05 PM
    Subject: RE: [Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why very few new caches lately in
    Arizona?]



    > With the 1% rule in place I guess the Tres Hombres are safe we are at
    1.45%
    > that is until I log all the ones I have done and not logged.
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Mark Heitowit [mailto:mheitowit@usa.net]
    > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:46 PM
    > To: 
    > Subject: Re: [Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why very few new caches lately in
    > Arizona?]

    >

    >
    > If every team with 100 or more finds were to place 1% of their finds,
    there
    > would be more caches than Circle K's and Walgreens combined here in
    Phoenix.

    >
    > "Trisha" wrote:

    >
    > > OK, not to belabor my point (but I guess this will) I just checked
the
    > > AZ caching stats. Of the top 25 teams, all with over 350 finds, just
    > > over half have hidden LESS THAN 10 caches. I'm not picking on
anybody
    > > in particular, but maybe if those who are benefitting the most (most
    > > finds) would step up and put out a few more caches (no more excuses!
    > > you have over 350 finds!) then it would make Ken happier....?
    > > Trisha "Lightning"
    > > Prescott

    > >

    > >

    > >

    > >
    > > On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:02:18 -0700 (PDT), Ken Akerman wrote:

    > >
    > > I've been looking at the list of new caches, and it appears that
there
    > > is very little new cache activity in Arizona during the past week.
    > > There have been only two new caches approved in Arizona since Sept.
2,
    > > while in Utah there have been 19 new caches approved in the past
seven
    > > days.

    > >
    > > There are many great places to put caches in the high elevations of
    > > Arizona. There are still many regions of the state of Arizona that
    > > don't have many caches. I may make one or two new caches and hide
them
    > > this weekend, potentially near the Mogollon Rim. Don't complain
about< BR>> > the heat in the Phoenix area - the high elevations are less
than two
    > > hours away and the gasoline is less expensive in towns like Payson
and
    > > Prescott than it is in Phoenix.

    > >
    > > Why does Utah continue to outpace Arizona in cache activity? Utah
has
    > > less than half the population of Arizona, yet Utah has 1,893 caches
as
    > > of today, while Arizona has 1,733 caches. We really should have more
    > > caches than our neighboring state to the north. (This has always
    > > irritated me that Utah has more caches than Arizona. Why should Utah
    > > be a better geocaching state than Arizona? I would like to challenge
    > > Arizona to become the best geocaching state in the USA).

    > >
    > > Ken (a.k.a. Highpointer)
    > > ____________________________________________________________
    > > Az-Geocaching mailing list 
    > > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
    > > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching

    > >
    > > Arizona's Geocaching Resource
    > > http://www.azgeocaching.com

    > >

    >

    >

    >
    > ____________________________________________________________
    > Az-Geocaching mailing list 
    > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
    > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching

    >
    > Arizona's Geocaching Resource
    > http://www.azgeocaching.com
    > ____________________________________________________________
    > Az-Geocaching mailing list 
    > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
    > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching

    >
    > Arizona's Geocaching Resource
    > http://www.azgeocaching.com


    ____________________________________________________________
    Az-Geocaching mailing list 
    To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
    http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching


    Arizona's Geocaching Resource
    http://www.azgeocaching.com




Tsegi Mike and Desert Viking

  Till a voice, as bad as Conscience, rang interminable changes
    On one everlasting Whisper day and night repeated -- so:
  "Something hidden.  Go and find it. Go and look behind the Ranges --
    "Something lost behind the Ranges. Lost and waiting for you. Go!"


Rudyard Kipling , The Explorer 1898


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software