Re: [Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why very few new caches lately in A…

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Trisha
Date:  
To: listserv
Subject: Re: [Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why very few new caches lately in Arizona?]
I frankly have no idea what would make Ken (HP, not you Lincoln)
HappY, notice I said happIER.... lol (just kidding)
Trisha


On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 13:34:21 -0700, Mark Heitowit wrote:

>
> Would they have to be member only caches to make Ken happy? (Just
> joking,
> couldn't resist).
>
> "Trisha" <> wrote:
>
> > OK, not to belabor my point (but I guess this will) I just checked
> the
> > AZ caching stats. Of the top 25 teams, all with over 350 finds,

just
> > over half have hidden LESS THAN 10 caches. I'm not picking on

anybody
> > in particular, but maybe if those who are benefitting the most

(most
> > finds) would step up and put out a few more caches (no more

excuses!
> > you have over 350 finds!) then it would make Ken happier....?
> > Trisha "Lightning"
> > Prescott
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:02:18 -0700 (PDT), Ken Akerman wrote:
> >
> > I've been looking at the list of new caches, and it appears that
> there
> > is very little new cache activity in Arizona during the past

week.  
> > There have been only two new caches approved in Arizona since Sept.
> 2,
> > while in Utah there have been 19 new caches approved in the past
> seven
> > days.
> >  
> > There are many great places to put caches in the high elevations of
> > Arizona.  There are still many regions of the state of Arizona that
> > don't have many caches. I may make one or two new caches and hide
> them
> > this weekend, potentially near the Mogollon Rim.  Don't complain
> about
> > the heat in the Phoenix area - the high elevations are less than

two
> > hours away and the gasoline is less expensive in towns like Payson
> and
> > Prescott than it is in Phoenix.
> >  
> > Why does Utah continue to outpace Arizona in cache activity?  Utah
> has
> > less than half the population of Arizona, yet Utah has 1,893 caches
> as
> > of today, while Arizona has 1,733 caches.  We really should have

more
> > caches than our neighboring state to the north.  (This has always
> > irritated me that Utah has more caches than Arizona.  Why should

Utah
> > be a better geocaching state than Arizona?  I would like to

challenge
> > Arizona to become the best geocaching state in the USA).
> >  
> > Ken (a.k.a. Highpointer)
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > Az-Geocaching mailing list
> > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> >
> > Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> > http://www.azgeocaching.com
> >
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com