At 09:32 AM 5/8/2003 -0700, you wrote:
>The "5" rating should be assigned very infrequently. The rating of "4"
>that I calculated still is pretty high, only one step lower.
Actually, my understanding was that 4 was for a cache that was very hard,
but didn't require anything but the cacher. If a cache required any
equipment beyond the cacher, then it was a 5.
Perhaps they should look at having a different, or expanded rating system
for the terrain of the caches where there is a star rating and then some
sort of follow on designation for equipment. Perhaps something like 3B for
3 star that requires a bike.
Scott
scott@myblueheaven.com
www.myblueheaven.com
(text/plain)