Re: [Az-Geocaching] For the Caching gods

Bill,

I caught that. I'll be seeing "the fish" tomorrow . . . I'm sure he will add his two cents then. [:-D]

Rand

----- Original Message -----
From: Bill Tomlinson
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 4:48 PM
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] For the Caching gods

Rand, You left the fish speechless! ;-)


*******************************************************************

-----Original Message-----
From: az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com [mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of Regan Smith
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 2:35 PM
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] For the Caching gods

*******************************************************************
----- Original Message -----
From: RAND HARDIN
To: AZ-Geocaching
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 1:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] For the Caching gods


Okay, I too am now upset! I just sent notes to Ken about my displeasure about not being able to read new posts to his caches that I had found prior to him changing them over to Members Only caches. I also expressed my feelings about how the change has affected the stats (it took two of my finds and moved them over to "out-of-state" finds). I'm like Scott - I will not seek "out-of-state" caches! I too enjoy the numbers game!

Ken explained to me his feelings about why dedicated geocachers should become Premium Members and suggested that I too become a member. I responded with my feelings and why I cannot afford to become a member at this time.

Ken sounds very strong in his reasoning and beliefs. I did suggest to him that if he is so convicted to his feelings, that maybe he should boycott enjoying any non-members caches.

Is it fair for someone to limit their caches to "members only" - but in turn goes out and finds regular caches!? (Hypocrisy?)

Rand (RandMan)