RE: [Az-Geocaching] For the Caching gods

Top Page
This message is part of the following thread:
Mthe complete thread tree sorted by date
MRegan Smith at <-
MScott Wood at ->
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Bill Tomlinson
Date:  
To: listserv
Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] For the Caching gods
I'm in. Do you guys have a paypal account?

-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of Regan
Smith
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 11:24 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] For the Caching gods


I say we all donate a $ to Jason and Brian


----- Original Message -----
From: "Groover" <>
To: <>
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 11:15 AM
Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] For the Caching gods


> Personally I am torn about registering. The impression I have gotten
> over the last year and a half of the people who run the geocaching.com
> web site is not very favourable (which I won't go into here), however
> I get a great deal or fun out of the site. I don't like giving money
> to people I don't think I like, but I see that running a web site for
> free is
hard/impossible.
> So I've been stuck in this quandry ever since the "charter membership"
thing
> appeared.
> I guess if they turned around and said "we are going to implement X, Y
> and
Z
> to make it easier for handicap people to gague the real accessiblity
> of a cache" (of which I have posted ideas on the site in the past)
> then that would definately give me a big enough push to register. As
> for anything else, I don't know...
>
> Sigh....
>
> Andy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> [mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com]On Behalf Of
> Bill Tomlinson
> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 10:56 AM
> To:
> Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] For the Caching gods
>
>
> Andy,
>
> It would take a bit of work, but I would think that you could re-log
> all
of
> your old finds with your new name and then delete the old finds.
Geocaching
> lets you specify the find date, so you would still have an accurate
history.
>
> As for geocaching.com, I doubt that the issue is hoarding data or
bandwidth.
> Both of those are already irrelevant because data is being grabbed by
> many crawlers already and that isn't a terribly efficient mechanism.
> I'm
willing
> to bet that the issue is simply resources. Design and implementation
> of a system that all would be happy with could be a very difficult
> task. Look how long it's taken just to change the numbering scheme.
> And that's a
time
> critical issue. I imagine of more people were willing to register we
would
> see much better services in exchange. Personally, I don't much care
> if people choose register. We just need to be aware of the
> implications of those decisions. I chose to register because I'm
> interested in seeing new features like this.
>
> CacheLess
> Bill Tomlinson
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> [mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of
> Andrew Ayre
> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 10:06 AM
> To:
> Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] For the Caching gods
>
>
> I don't think the problem is so much MO caches as the fact that
> geocaching.com appears IMO to want to horde the data and not share it
> with sites like azgeocaching.com by providing a backdoor entry into
> specific sections of the database. I cannot see how providing access
> to the AZ only caches would cause a problem for geocaching.com (in
> terms of rivalry worries, etc - I'm sure it would increase the
> bandwidth used).
>
> We recently changed our name from "Groover" to "Team Spike". This has
> completely messed up our team stats on the azgeocaching.com site, as
> it relies on reading cached pages. Well, archived caches never get
> their
pages
> re-cached, therefore those caches will eternally be attributed to
"groover"
> on azgeocaching.com, wheras the actual data in the geocaching.com
> database must be correct.
>
> As a result I've resorted to making a copy of all log entries on my
> own
web
> site, so at least I have a copy of my own data that I can manipulate
> in my own database and know it is always correct and accurate.
> Unfortunately I don't have time to write code to generate graphs and
> other wonderful stuff that can be found on azgeocaching.com.
>
> Andy
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> [mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com]On Behalf Of
> Scott Nicol
> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 9:33 AM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] For the Caching gods
>
>
>
>
> Ok. I don't usually fuss with much, but this one definetly irritates
> me. I am one of those 'numbers' cachers. I do enjoy looking at the
> stats and the numbers (for my own pleasure of course, not for
> competitive purposes). I
am
> a bit annoyed that 9 of my in state cache finds now show up as out of
state.
>
> This is the result of 8 AZ caches becoming 'members only' caches.
> These
are
> caches that previously (when I found them), where not MO. What happens
> is that the AZgeocaching.com site is not a member, therefore it doesnt
> crawl the MO cache pages. (that is what I have heard anyways). At any
> rate, the
AZ
> stats doesnt recognize Arizona MO caches and they show up in the out
> of state file. (anyone who knows me knows that I have 0 out of state
> finds
and
> probably always will!).
>
> I personally beleive that if a cache is started out as a 'free' cache,
> it should remain that way for the life of the cache. If someone
> chooses to
make
> their caches members only, they should do so with only the new caches
> that they place and not turn all their old caches into MO caches. I
> know Highpointer recently commented on this on the listserve a few
> days ago and that he was going to change his caches over to MO. I
> understand his views
on
> the subject. However, Highpointer...I feel you should keep your old
> caches open to all and if you want members only, perhaps only turn
> your new ones into MO. The other problem I have with old caches
> changing into MO... I no longer can look back on those caches and read
> my logs (diary if you will)
of
> my experiences at those caches (as I am not a member of
> geocaching.com;
that
> is a whole nuther' thread, I am sure!). I hope Highpointer will
> reconsider changing his old caches back to non-MO.
>
> I have always enjoyed doing Highpointer's caches, he hides some good
> ones.
I
> also very much appreciate his seeking my cache on Stewart Mountain and
> the comments he left there. I think me and Highpointer share many of
> the same views on geocaching and enjoy doing the same types of caches.
>
> I guess I will not be able to do anymore of Highpointer's caches as I
> am
not
> a member of geocaching.com. However, I have no problem with his making
> his new caches MO, Members Only caches are available as an option to
> members
of
> geocaching.com and that is an option that is available to him to use
> if he chooses to. I just wish he would reconsider and keep his older
> caches open to all.
>
> Scott
> Team Ropingthewind
>
>
>
>
> >From: Brian Cluff <>
> >Reply-To:
> >To:
> >Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] For the Caching gods
> >Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 08:12:21 -0700
> >
> >Yes, if caches are being moved to members only that were previously
> >available to anyone, they will show up as out of state.
> >
> >Brian Cluff
> >Team Snaptek
> >
> >Regan Smith wrote:
> >
> >>Would the new out of state finds be a result of the Member Only
> >>Caches?
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com

____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching

Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com


This message was posted to the following mailing lists:
AzGeocaching.com
Mailing List Info | Nearby Messages		<-Re: [Az-Geocaching] For the Caching godsRE: [Az-Geocaching] For the Caching gods->
AzGeocaching administrated by AdminLurker (version 2.3)