Re: [Az-Geocaching] Log Volume I

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
+ (text/html)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Jerry Nelson
Date:  
To: listserv
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Log Volume I
MessageI see how this is a difficult choice. We all know that one of the enjoyments of finding a cache is to read old logs. I'd say that most of the time it would be better to leave old log books in the cache except where the chance of losing them is unusually high or they have unusual value. Mark them as "Archived--write logs in other book" or something like that. Even if it was eventually plundered at least a few more would be able to read it. There certainly are exceptions and the final choice should be with the cache owner. He or she has a right to preserve the history of his own efforts. At minimum a note might be placed at the beginning of the new book indicating the first had been removed.

Cindy suggested that we someday hold an event cache where everyone brings old log books to view. Maybe after many years there will be a National Museum of Geocaching. Shelly could be invited to be curator.

Jerry
Offtrail

----- Original Message -----
From: Team Tierra Buena
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 11:28 PM
Subject: [Az-Geocaching] Log Volume I


For a change I have a question.

We currently have "Dogcacher" on the Disabled List. It was reported that the container was rusting and the log book was filled, both of which are true. When we replace the cache, do we get to keep the full log book at home, or should we return it to the cache along with a new book?

I'm inclined to keep it. Why? Imperial Eagle's first find of the cache at 2 in the morning (Darren, we hope you're well). Or how about this excerpt, just a year and three days ago: "1st of many, hopefully!" You got that right, RopingTheWind! Why would I want to risk notes like that to theft or plunder?

At the same time, returning the log book to the cache lets other finders share them as well. But do finders read all the log entries? I don't think that's the case. And inevitably, someone will find a blank page in the old book, and post their now-out-of-sequence entry there.

I don't think I've ever seen the issue discussed before. I'm open to anyone's thoughts.

Steve
Team Tierra Buena