Thank you. Let's please consider this subject closed.
Trisha
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Scott Wood wrote:
>
> At 10:55 AM 11/30/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>
> >Scott,
> >
> >I already edited my log entry to make it less annoying and upsetting
> >for people like you. Many times I 'joke' in my logs, the original
> >intent of part of this log, but obviously that is lost on some
people
> >who are overly senstive to certain issues. I will be more careful in
> >the future to not upset you.
>
> If I would have read your log as it now stands, I would have never
> posted
> my first message. It is much clearer now that you were close to the
> gunfire and the possibility of getting shot was there. It simply
> didn't
> say that at first, and to come across with a message that you jus
> about got
> shot didn't seem warranted in that light. It is different with the
> clearer
> picture in the logs.
>
>
> >There is a difference between hearing a bullet "zing" past you, and
> >hearing it hit a building. DUH. By the way, does "hunkered down"
mean
> >anything to you, like, for example, we thought the gunfire was
close??
> >Think!!
>
> Now you are the one being insulting. Yes, "hunkered down" means
> something,
> it means hunkering down. It doesn't mean that gunfire was close.
> Saying
> that the gunfire was close means that the gunfire was close.
>
> Please remember that this is a 2D medium that we are communicating
in,
> and
> words mean things. Humor and sarcasm don't translate well in e-mail.
>
> >there, I am experienced and know what I am talking about, you did
call
> >me certain names or imply certain things, and I wait for an apology.
>
> Again, I don't believe that I ever called you a name, but if you
> perceived
> it that way, I am sorry, it wasn't meant as such.
>
> >I will not get into a senseless debate with you when the facts are
SO
> >obvious, and I am sure all the people on this list don't want to
hear
>
> Again, now that you have told more of the story, the facts are
> becoming
> more and more clear, it just wasn't the case at first.
>
> >If someone gets shot near that cache, accidently, they have been
> >warned.
>
> It would be tragic if someone got shot at any cache. We spent the
> entire
> day in the Redington Pass area yesterday. That area is very popular
> with
> target shooters, and we heard gunshots everywhere we went. I never
> felt
> that I was about to get shot, but I never heard the bullets hit a
> building
> next to me. That would have been a different matter entirely.
>
> Again, I apologize for the misunderstanding.
>
>
> In liberty,
>
> Scott
>
> wood@myblueheaven.com
> www.myblueheaven.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> listserv@azgeocaching.com
> <a
href="
http://mail.brasher.com/jump/http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching">
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching</a>
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> <a
href="
http://mail.brasher.com/jump/http://www.azgeocaching.com">
http://www.azgeocaching.com</a>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Although no one can go back and
make a brand new start,
Anyone can start from now and
make a brand new ending."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
(text/plain)