RE: [Az-Geocaching] Destruction of geological site(s?)

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
+ (text/html)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Farquhar, Larry
Date:  
To: 'listserv@azgeocaching.com'
Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] Destruction of geological site(s?)
Anyone care to share which cache is being referred to in the White Tanks?
There's a few caches there I haven't done. The ones that I have done in the
White Tanks - I can't think of any of them being an archeological site. You
can Email me privately.

Libby - I know one of your caches that I wanted to visit the nearby
archeological site, but it was late in the day. We looked at it with
binoculars and still plan to visit it someday.
Larry Farquhar
Team "Wyle E"
www.happy-wanderers.com

-----Original Message-----
From: WOLFB8 [mailto:Wolfb8@cox.net]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2002 7:14 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Destruction of geological site(s?)


Interesting ....... I do agree with some point that they made....I am in to
archaeology ...and know of some really kewl places that I wanted to share
with other geocacher...not sure how they would respect the area I hide a
cache about .1 mile from the site and in the log book told cacher how to get
to the site ....if they wanted to explore it..... for what I can tell from
the logs only 3 people took the time to look around.... most were into the
cache and go bit..... now I know that everyone of them would have gone and
seen the site if the got score for it....    I do believe that we have a
right to visit all the archaeological site that are on public lands.....but
I also think that virtual caches should be used at them to help prevent
damage..... lets face it if each one of us turned over just one rock when
looking for a cache.....after 20 people the landscape would look totally
different..... From reading the article we all know what caches they are
talking about....


just my 2 cents
We will be known by the tracks we leave behin