Re: [Az-Geocaching] Cache Placing Philosophy

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Bob Renner
Date:  
To: listserv
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Cache Placing Philosophy
Well, isn't infinity bigger than 546/2 ?

I haven't heard anything about the cache being
archived or removed by anyone. The location is one of
the more remote areas of the canyon. The North Bass
trail is a very long and indistinct trail that is
seldom used. About the only sane way to this cache is
the way it was placed - by raft trip. Judging by the
number of finds on my Bright Angel trail cache (which
is a VERY heavily used trail) the Bass Ackwards cache
may not be found for years. I also doubt that the
rangers are concerned enough about this cache to want
to bother to go after it and remove it.

Bob


--- Brian Cluff <> wrote:
> according to mathimatics it's impossible to do days
> per finds, cause it
> causes a divide by zero :) aka infinity
> 492/0
>
> I'm wondering if that particular cache is still
> there. Has anyone even
> attempted it yet?



=====
.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/