Re: [Az-Geocaching] Question - Cache or Caches

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Team Cache-Quest
Date:  
To: az-geocaching
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Question - Cache or Caches
I've been planning something similar near Phoenix. A set of several related
caches in a single area, each containing clues to one or more of the
others. For what I'm planning there could be many different 'routes' among
the caches. The further you got the more difficult it would become.

Although I think they could all be done in a single day, I've been planning
to do individual caches. Since there wouldn't be a set order and it would
get increasingly difficult, I thought it would be better that way.

From a selfish standpoint, multiple caches would attract more attention to
the set of caches because it would provide a nice boost to a visitor's
stats. I'm planning the caches in a relatively remote area and I want to
draw people to them.

Jerry
Team Cache-Quest


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Henson" <>
To: <>
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 3:27 PM
Subject: [Az-Geocaching] Question - Cache or Caches


>
> I am getting ready to place a chain cache in the Prescott area. I was
> wondering if players would rather see several caches, or one large cache
> after having to go to several (6 or 7) sites? - Lincoln
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
>
> http://listserv.snaptek.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching