Wolfb8 has given several indications
that her stats are incorrect (caches found but not logged and friends
finding caches and logging them on her id).
Dude you need to stop ... I asked a question.... I have been present at all
log caches under Wolfb8.... I have have been the one to hide the every cache
that has been hidden under said log in... I am no longer logging find
right now do to personal reason...... and do not know if I will log when
when i can...... but when the time come i will log the caches that have been
hidden..... just because they will be worthless unless they are posted....
DO NOT try to speak for me
libby
----- Original Message -----
From: <
srdrake@srpnet.com>
To: <
az-geocaching@listserv.snaptek.com>
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 12:04 PM
Subject: [Az-Geocaching] Re: Geocaching "Teams"
> Please ignore all stats and records when considering what caches to start.
> If you have a great idea for a series of caches, then go for it. I'd love
> to see some new creative caches. (Rumor has it that there are 5 caches in
> the trunk of n4/c's car. You just got to figure out the coordinates!)
>
> I view the stats and records (that I've summarized on my webpage) as sort
of
> snapshots of what the geocaching is like today and for the past 18 months.
> I expect that the hobby will grow during the next 12 months that stats and
> records today will all be blown out of the water.
>
> There are great inaccuracies in the stats. There are several active
> geocachers who don't log many of their finds. Team Sand Dollar has found
> over 50 but has logged less than 10. Wolfb8 has given several indications
> that her stats are incorrect (caches found but not logged and friends
> finding caches and logging them on her id). And there's others... The
> stats are meant for fun and not for competition. I've used the stats
myself
> as motivations and setting a target of what I want to go find. I love the
> stats.
>
> On another note, I've been curious to download the .csv files of caches
each
> team has done and line them up on a spreadsheet for the teams that have
done
> the most AZ caches. I am curious if a merger of teams 2-10 (in AZ ranking
> of AZ caches found) would collectively have more caches found in AZ than
> Wyle E. (In a way that makes me think of playing Monopoly with 6
people...
> Mergers occur and it soon ends up into being two mega-teams.)
>
> -srdrake
>
> _______________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> Az-Geocaching@listserv.snaptek.com
> http://listserv.snaptek.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
(text/plain)