I think the intent was that if you donated for the NY/DC victims, it
would be classified
as a find. That's the way I read the cache page and that looks like
what everyone else
is doing. If nothing else, the find puts a smiley face on the log and I
think that looks
a lot better than the note icon. It also gives an indication of how
many times the cache
has generated a positive response rather than a neutral response. This
is basically a
virtual cache and the criterium for logging was stated in the cache
page.
I also have donated blood in the past (94 times) but I have not logged
94 finds. Nor has
anyone else that I can see. I donated yesterday (#95) and logged it as
one find. Do you
see anything wrong with that? I don't.
I think there is too much concern over how other people log caches.
That is basically
between the owner of the cache and the person making the log.
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: Cody Brown [
mailto:cbrown@triumphairrepair.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2001 2:13 PM
To: '
az-geocaching@listserv.snaptek.com'
Subject: [Az-Geocaching] What's a "Find"??
What's going on with people logging finds on the blood drive cache? I
too have donated blood and do not consider it a "find". I say we should
be marking them as "Other".
Any other comments on this would be greatly appreciated.
Cody
(text/plain)