To add my opinion.....
Logically, I don't think it is fair to log a "find" on a cache that you hid,
since you already know where it is. It is therefore, not a "find". Think
about it....you don't need the GPS coordinates or clues to "find it", since
you know exactly where you put it! This defeats the spirit and maybe the
rules of the geo-caching hobby. Maintenance visits or updates (like I did on
my "Spruce" cache) should be logged as "notes".
I will repeat the logic and see what other's opinions are: You can't
legitimately "find" something if you hid it and already know where it is.
~~trisha
----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry Farquhar" <
lfar@home.com>
To: <
az-geocaching@listserv.snaptek.com>
Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 6:54 AM
Subject: [Az-Geocaching] Finding Own Cache???
> Thought I'd stir up some more conversation and possibly a controversy.
>
> I have mixed feelings about this, and wondered what you thought. I've seen
> where a cacher logs a "find" for their own cache (a cache they hid). What
do
> you think? Is this an acceptable practice or a no-no?
>
> BTW - can anyone (Jason) tell us how many people are on this list?
>
> Larry Farquhar
> Team "Wyle E"
> www.azjeeper.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> Az-Geocaching@listserv.snaptek.com
> http://listserv.snaptek.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
(text/plain)