[Az-Geocaching] Old School?

Brian Casteel bcasteel at uccinc.net
Thu Apr 30 10:25:58 CDT 2009


That's a really good point.  While I much prefer rural caching now (although I haven't been out in months...winter and other issues preventing), I think I've always preferred them over anything urban.  But Old Guard is more appropriate IMNSHO.

Brian
Team A.I.


________________________________
From: az-geocaching-bounces at listserv.azgeocaching.com [mailto:az-geocaching-bounces at listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of AZcachemeister
Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2009 21:42
To: listserv at azgeocaching.com
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Old School?

It seems to me there is some confusion between 'Old School' and 'Old Guard'.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't 'Old School' denote an attitude about a particular activity, whereas 'Old Guard' would reference those who were the pioneers in said activity?
Definitely an 'Old School' attitude here, but not really 'Old Guard' since I started on 12/8/2002.

ACM
________________________________


Team Sprocket wrote:

From: Scott Wood <scott at myblueheaven.com><mailto:scott at myblueheaven.com>

Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Old School?

I guess I would say "old school" are those that started in the 2001 to
2003 range.

I guess I qualify. I started caching in late September 2002.  Although, I consider myself part of the "second generation" of Arizona geocachers.  There were (and still are) a handful of individuals who paved the way for geocaching in Arizona.  To them, we all owe a great debt.


From: "Bill Nolan"  <bill at freeholder.com><mailto:bill at freeholder.com>

Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Old School?


Speaking of Wyle E...  How many of you  other oldtimers remember the time a
non-existent cache was "placed" in  Phoenix not far from Wyle E's home.

I remember!!  In fact, my first cache was a "Wyle E" puzzle cache (GC3788) Mission: Looney Tunes.  AJ.JR had invited me along to help him "solve the puzzle."  On our ride home from the cache, we marvelled that "Wyle E" had over 600 finds! We thought (then) that we could never approach that number.  By the end of the year, I had 139 finds. Over the next 3 years, I averaged 725 finds per year.


From: "Tahosa McCarthy" <Tahosa_the_Cacher at msn.com><mailto:Tahosa_the_Cacher at msn.com>

Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Soooo?

Scott:
Actually cachers never leave the game, they just hibernate for a short period of time.

  In 2007, I had only 25 finds!  I guess I was in hibernation mode that year.[cid:897322415 at 30042009-32D1]


From: "Victoria" <Hahnizona at cox.net><mailto:Hahnizona at cox.net>

Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Old School?

Gotta love that! Competition for the least amount of finds with the most
active hides?

How 'bout most (logged) DNF's? I'm at 246 (and counting.)

-- Sprocket
(another Scott!)






________________________________

____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com<mailto:listserv at azgeocaching.com>
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching

Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com


________________________________
DISCLAIMER:
This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that the dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you receive this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the sender at either the e-mail address or by calling the telephone number associated with this transmission. Please delete this e-mail from your computer (or discard this fax). Thank You.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/20090430/24923d9f/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 96 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/20090430/24923d9f/attachment.gif>


More information about the Az-Geocaching mailing list