[Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!

[noshdoo tsoh]

Well, since I came on so strong with my comments, I feel I owe the list and
my friend, Shadowace, these comments as well: 

 

I have never met a better group as the people I've met since I started
geocaching, and regardless of the opinion differences, it's all good. I'm
sure it wouldn't be the same if people didn't feel strongly about geocaching
in their own way -- even though everyone else is totally wrong! ;-) Thanks,
Mel.

 

noshdoo tsoh

 

 

  _____  

From: az-geocaching-bounces at listserv.azgeocaching.com
[mailto:az-geocaching-bounces at listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of MEL
HOCKWITT
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 4:39 PM
To: listserv at azgeocaching.com
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!

 

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: ShadowAce <mailto:shadowace.az at gmail.com>  

To: listserv at azgeocaching.com 

Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 12:14 AM

Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Only an altoids tin!!

 

Hmm..

 Interesting.. Nope


 Sorry my comment was _ I stress again _ Not about to Micro or Not to
Micro..

 It was about GET PERMISSION FOR THE CACHE YOU PLACE..

 Then feel free to log how you really feel on a micro or non micro cache. No
more wondering if I will be arrested or just asked to get off the property
when I look around a power box. 



On 2/10/07, noshdoo tsoh <geocaching at deepsouthwest.com> wrote: 

"Trust me, just because there are more micros than rural caches, doesn't
mean they're more POPULAR."

 

It's not the number of caches that makes them popular, but the number of
finds on each cache. The fact that they are found at a rate exponentially
higher than other caches does indicate popularity. Or am I missing the
definition of 'popular'? Back it up with numbers?  ;-)

 

"We're trying to encourage good micros and urban caches and discourage the
placement of bad ones."

 

A noble cause, indeed. Can I see you're scientific study on what is good and
what is bad? You are the decider? Oh, that's right, trust you.

 

Back to you're regularly scheduled rant.

 



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/20070212/3cbb4e18/attachment.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 20755 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/20070212/3cbb4e18/attachment.jpeg