[Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why very few new caches lately in Arizona?]
Trisha
listserv@azgeocaching.com
Sat, 13 Sep 2003 21:58:24 -0700 (MST)
YUM....Three of the best restaurants in Prescott, not counting the
Mexican and Chinese places...
As a friend recently said...and I think this is a great "quote for
living": "there are TAKERS, and there are GIVERS, and the TAKERS will
NEVER understand"
I sure hope some of the Phx folks can make it up next weekend for the
breakfast event. The weather is GORGEOUS....you can literally see
forever!
Trisha "Lightning"
Prescott
On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 21:29:48 -0700, "Richard E Holmes" wrote:
Try Zuma's, especially at happy hour!
----- Original Message -----
From:
Mimi Philpott
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 6:28
PM
Subject: RE: [Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why
very few new caches lately in Arizona?]
or
Murphey's
-----Original Message-----From:
az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com
[mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com]On Behalf Of
Gale DraperSent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 4:27
PMTo: listserv@azgeocaching.comSubject:
Re: [Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why very few new caches lately in
Arizona?]
PLace one at Gurley Street Grill and I'm there.Regan L
Smith <buggers@mindspring.com> wrote:
a
better idea let's all carpool with ken and place a cache under
every
parkbench in Prescott!!!!!!!!!!Think people I rather
have quality that quantity just placing a cache toget a find is
not a
reason to place a cache, I also feel that until you havefound a
minimum of 50 percent of the caches placed in the state,
don'tbemoan
the point and waste your time which could be better spent on
findingall those caches that people do place under a park bench
and
not say on topof a hill with a slight cave...-----
Original Message ----- From: "Ford, Denny"
To: Sent:
Tuesday, September 09, 2003 2:05 PMSubject: RE: [Re:
[Az-Geocaching]
Why very few new caches lately inArizona?]> With the 1%
rule in place I guess the Tres Hombres are safe we are at1.45%>
that is until I log all the ones I have done and not
logged.>> -----Original Message-----> From: Mark
Heitowit [mailto:mheitowit@usa.net]> Sent: Tuesday, September
09,
2003 1:46 PM> To: listserv@azgeocaching.com> Subject: Re:
[Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why very few new caches lately in>
Arizona?]>>> If every team with 100 or more finds
were to place 1% of their finds,there> would be more caches
than Circle K's and Walgreens combined here inPhoenix.>>
"Trisha" wrote:>> > OK, not to
belabor my point (but I guess this will) I just checked the> >
AZ caching stats. Of the top 25 teams, all with over 350 finds,
just> > over half have hidden LESS THAN 10 caches. I'm not
picking on anybody> > in particular, but maybe if those who are
benefitting the most (most> > finds) would step up and put out a
few more caches (no more excuses!> > you have over 350 finds!)
then it would make Ken happier....?> > Trisha
"Lightning"> > Prescott> >> >>
>> >> > On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:02:18 -0700 (PDT),
Ken Akerman wrote:> >> > I've been looking at the list
of new caches, and it appears that there> > is very little new
cache activity in Arizona during the past week.> > There have
been only two new caches approved in Arizona since Sept. 2,> >
while in Utah there have been 19 new caches approved in the past
seven> > days.> >> > There are many great
places to put caches in the high elevations of> > Arizona. There
are still many regions of the state of Arizona that> > don't
have many caches. I may make one or two new caches and hide
them>
> this weekend, potentially near the Mogollon Rim. Don't
complain
about< BR>> > the heat in the Phoenix area - the high
elevations are less than two> > hours away and the gasoline is
less expensive in towns like Payson and> > Prescott than it is
in Phoenix.> >> > Why does Utah continue to outpace
Arizona in cache activity? Utah has> > less than half the
population of Arizona, yet Utah has 1,893 caches as> > of today,
while Arizona has 1,733 caches. We really should have more> >
caches than our neighboring state to the north. (This has
always>
> irritated me that Utah has more caches than Arizona. Why
should
Utah> > be a better geocaching state than Arizona? I would like
to challenge> > Arizona to become the best geocaching state in
the USA).> >> > Ken (a.k.a. Highpointer)> >
____________________________________________________________> >
Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com> > To edit
your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:> >
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching>
>> > Arizona's Geocaching Resource> >
http://www.azgeocaching.com> >>>>>
____________________________________________________________>
Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com> To edit
your
setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:>
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching>>
Arizona's Geocaching Resource> http://www.azgeocaching.com>
____________________________________________________________>
Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com> To edit
your
setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:>
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching>>
Arizona's Geocaching Resource>
http://www.azgeocaching.com____________________________________________________________Az-Geocaching
mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.comTo edit your setting,
subscribe
or unsubscribe
visit:http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocachingArizona's
Geocaching
Resourcehttp://www.azgeocaching.com
Tsegi Mike and Desert Viking
Till a voice, as bad as Conscience, rang
interminable changes On one everlasting Whisper day and night
repeated -- so:"Something hidden. Go and find it. Go and look
behind the Ranges -- "Something lost behind the Ranges. Lost and
waiting for you. Go!"
Rudyard Kipling , The
Explorer 1898
Do you Yahoo!?Yahoo!
SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design
software