[Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why very few new caches lately in Arizona?]
Richard E Holmes
listserv@azgeocaching.com
Sat, 13 Sep 2003 21:29:48 -0700
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0105_01C37A3E.28E58F80
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Try Zuma's, especially at happy hour!
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Mimi Philpott=20
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com=20
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 6:28 PM
Subject: RE: [Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why very few new caches lately in =
Arizona?]
or Murphey's
-----Original Message-----
From: az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com =
[mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com]On Behalf Of Gale =
Draper
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 4:27 PM
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
Subject: Re: [Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why very few new caches lately in =
Arizona?]
PLace one at Gurley Street Grill and I'm there.
Regan L Smith <buggers@mindspring.com> wrote:=20
a better idea let's all carpool with ken and place a cache under =
every park
bench in Prescott!!!!!!!!!!
Think people I rather have quality that quantity just placing a =
cache to
get a find is not a reason to place a cache, I also feel that =
until you have
found a minimum of 50 percent of the caches placed in the state, =
don't
bemoan the point and waste your time which could be better spent =
on finding
all those caches that people do place under a park bench and not =
say on top
of a hill with a slight cave...
----- Original Message -----=20
From: "Ford, Denny"=20
To:=20
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 2:05 PM
Subject: RE: [Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why very few new caches lately =
in
Arizona?]
> With the 1% rule in place I guess the Tres Hombres are safe we =
are at
1.45%
> that is until I log all the ones I have done and not logged.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Heitowit [mailto:mheitowit@usa.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:46 PM
> To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
> Subject: Re: [Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why very few new caches lately =
in
> Arizona?]
>
>
> If every team with 100 or more finds were to place 1% of their =
finds,
there
> would be more caches than Circle K's and Walgreens combined here =
in
Phoenix.
>
> "Trisha" wrote:
>
> > OK, not to belabor my point (but I guess this will) I just =
checked the
> > AZ caching stats. Of the top 25 teams, all with over 350 =
finds, just
> > over half have hidden LESS THAN 10 caches. I'm not picking on =
anybody
> > in particular, but maybe if those who are benefitting the most =
(most
> > finds) would step up and put out a few more caches (no more =
excuses!
> > you have over 350 finds!) then it would make Ken happier....?
> > Trisha "Lightning"
> > Prescott
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:02:18 -0700 (PDT), Ken Akerman wrote:
> >
> > I've been looking at the list of new caches, and it appears =
that there
> > is very little new cache activity in Arizona during the past =
week.
> > There have been only two new caches approved in Arizona since =
Sept. 2,
> > while in Utah there have been 19 new caches approved in the =
past seven
> > days.
> >
> > There are many great places to put caches in the high =
elevations of
> > Arizona. There are still many regions of the state of Arizona =
that
> > don't have many caches. I may make one or two new caches and =
hide them
> > this weekend, potentially near the Mogollon Rim. Don't =
complain about< BR>> > the heat in the Phoenix area - the high =
elevations are less than two
> > hours away and the gasoline is less expensive in towns like =
Payson and
> > Prescott than it is in Phoenix.
> >
> > Why does Utah continue to outpace Arizona in cache activity? =
Utah has
> > less than half the population of Arizona, yet Utah has 1,893 =
caches as
> > of today, while Arizona has 1,733 caches. We really should =
have more
> > caches than our neighboring state to the north. (This has =
always
> > irritated me that Utah has more caches than Arizona. Why =
should Utah
> > be a better geocaching state than Arizona? I would like to =
challenge
> > Arizona to become the best geocaching state in the USA).
> >
> > Ken (a.k.a. Highpointer)
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> > =
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> >
> > Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> > http://www.azgeocaching.com
> >
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com
Tsegi Mike and Desert Viking
Till a voice, as bad as Conscience, rang interminable changes
On one everlasting Whisper day and night repeated -- so:
"Something hidden. Go and find it. Go and look behind the Ranges --
"Something lost behind the Ranges. Lost and waiting for you. Go!"
Rudyard Kipling , The Explorer 1898
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
------=_NextPart_000_0105_01C37A3E.28E58F80
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1226" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Try Zuma's, especially at happy =
hour!</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dmphilpott@rni.net href=3D"mailto:mphilpott@rni.net">Mimi =
Philpott</A>=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dlistserv@azgeocaching.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:listserv@azgeocaching.com">listserv@azgeocaching.com</A> =
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, September 09, =
2003 6:28=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> RE: [Re: =
[Az-Geocaching] Why=20
very few new caches lately in Arizona?]</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D710202801-10092003><FONT face=3DArial =
color=3D#0000ff size=3D2>or=20
Murphey's</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><FONT =
face=3DTahoma=20
size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> <A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com">az-geocachi=
ng-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com</A>=20
[mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com]<B>On Behalf =
Of=20
</B>Gale Draper<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, September 09, 2003 4:27=20
PM<BR><B>To:</B> <A=20
=
href=3D"mailto:listserv@azgeocaching.com">listserv@azgeocaching.com</A><B=
R><B>Subject:</B>=20
Re: [Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why very few new caches lately in=20
Arizona?]<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV>PLace one at Gurley Street Grill and I'm =
there.<BR><BR><B><I>Regan L=20
Smith <buggers@mindspring.com></I></B> wrote:=20
<BLOCKQUOTE class=3Dreplbq=20
style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff =
2px solid">a=20
better idea let's all carpool with ken and place a cache under =
every=20
park<BR>bench in Prescott!!!!!!!!!!<BR><BR><BR><BR>Think people I =
rather=20
have quality that quantity just placing a cache to<BR>get a find =
is not a=20
reason to place a cache, I also feel that until you have<BR>found =
a=20
minimum of 50 percent of the caches placed in the state, =
don't<BR>bemoan=20
the point and waste your time which could be better spent on=20
finding<BR>all those caches that people do place under a park =
bench and=20
not say on top<BR>of a hill with a slight =
cave...<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>-----=20
Original Message ----- <BR>From: "Ford, Denny"=20
<DENNY.FORD6@HONEYWELL.COM><BR>To: =
<LISTSERV@AZGEOCACHING.COM><BR>Sent:=20
Tuesday, September 09, 2003 2:05 PM<BR>Subject: RE: [Re: =
[Az-Geocaching]=20
Why very few new caches lately in<BR>Arizona?]<BR><BR><BR>> =
With the 1%=20
rule in place I guess the Tres Hombres are safe we are =
at<BR>1.45%<BR>>=20
that is until I log all the ones I have done and not=20
logged.<BR>><BR>> -----Original Message-----<BR>> From: =
Mark=20
Heitowit [mailto:mheitowit@usa.net]<BR>> Sent: Tuesday, =
September 09,=20
2003 1:46 PM<BR>> To: listserv@azgeocaching.com<BR>> =
Subject: Re:=20
[Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why very few new caches lately in<BR>>=20
Arizona?]<BR>><BR>><BR>> If every team with 100 or more =
finds=20
were to place 1% of their finds,<BR>there<BR>> would be more =
caches=20
than Circle K's and Walgreens combined here =
in<BR>Phoenix.<BR>><BR>>=20
"Trisha" <TRISHA@BRASHER.COM>wrote:<BR>><BR>> > OK, not =
to=20
belabor my point (but I guess this will) I just checked =
the<BR>> >=20
AZ caching stats. Of the top 25 teams, all with over 350 finds,=20
just<BR>> > over half have hidden LESS THAN 10 caches. I'm =
not=20
picking on anybody<BR>> > in particular, but maybe if those =
who are=20
benefitting the most (most<BR>> > finds) would step up and =
put out a=20
few more caches (no more excuses!<BR>> > you have over 350 =
finds!)=20
then it would make Ken happier....?<BR>> > Trisha=20
"Lightning"<BR>> > Prescott<BR>> ><BR>> =
><BR>>=20
><BR>> ><BR>> > On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:02:18 -0700 =
(PDT),=20
Ken Akerman wrote:<BR>> ><BR>> > I've been looking at =
the list=20
of new caches, and it appears that there<BR>> > is very =
little new=20
cache activity in Arizona during the past week.<BR>> > There =
have=20
been only two new caches approved in Arizona since Sept. =
2,<BR>> >=20
while in Utah there have been 19 new caches approved in the past=20
seven<BR>> > days.<BR>> ><BR>> > There are many =
great=20
places to put caches in the high elevations of<BR>> > =
Arizona. There=20
are still many regions of the state of Arizona that<BR>> > =
don't=20
have many caches. I may make one or two new caches and hide =
them<BR>>=20
> this weekend, potentially near the Mogollon Rim. Don't =
complain=20
about< BR>> > the heat in the Phoenix area - the high=20
elevations are less than two<BR>> > hours away and the =
gasoline is=20
less expensive in towns like Payson and<BR>> > Prescott than =
it is=20
in Phoenix.<BR>> ><BR>> > Why does Utah continue to =
outpace=20
Arizona in cache activity? Utah has<BR>> > less than half =
the=20
population of Arizona, yet Utah has 1,893 caches as<BR>> > =
of today,=20
while Arizona has 1,733 caches. We really should have more<BR>> =
>=20
caches than our neighboring state to the north. (This has =
always<BR>>=20
> irritated me that Utah has more caches than Arizona. Why =
should=20
Utah<BR>> > be a better geocaching state than Arizona? I =
would like=20
to challenge<BR>> > Arizona to become the best geocaching =
state in=20
the USA).<BR>> ><BR>> > Ken (a.k.a. =
Highpointer)<BR>> >=20
=
____________________________________________________________<BR>> =
>=20
Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com<BR>> > =
To edit=20
your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:<BR>> >=20
=
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching<BR>>=20
><BR>> > Arizona's Geocaching Resource<BR>> >=20
http://www.azgeocaching.com<BR>> =
><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>>=20
=
____________________________________________________________<BR>>=20
Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com<BR>> To =
edit your=20
setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:<BR>>=20
=
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching<BR>><B=
R>>=20
Arizona's Geocaching Resource<BR>> =
http://www.azgeocaching.com<BR>>=20
=
____________________________________________________________<BR>>=20
Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com<BR>> To =
edit your=20
setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:<BR>>=20
=
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching<BR>><B=
R>>=20
Arizona's Geocaching Resource<BR>>=20
=
http://www.azgeocaching.com<BR><BR>______________________________________=
______________________<BR>Az-Geocaching=20
mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com<BR>To edit your setting, =
subscribe=20
or unsubscribe=20
=
visit:<BR>http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching=
<BR><BR>Arizona's=20
Geocaching=20
Resource<BR>http://www.azgeocaching.com</BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR><BR>
<DIV>
<DIV>Tsegi Mike and Desert Viking</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#6633cc></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#6633cc>Till a voice, as bad as Conscience, rang=20
interminable changes<BR> On one everlasting Whisper day and =
night=20
repeated -- so:<BR>"Something hidden. Go and find it. Go and =
look=20
behind the Ranges --<BR> "Something lost behind the Ranges. =
Lost and=20
waiting for you. Go!"</FONT></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#6633cc></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#6633cc>Rudyard Kipling , The=20
Explorer 1898</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<P>
<HR SIZE=3D1>
Do you Yahoo!?<BR><A=20
=
href=3D"http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=3D10469/*http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com"=
>Yahoo!=20
SiteBuilder</A> - Free, easy-to-use web site design=20
software</BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0105_01C37A3E.28E58F80--