[Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why very few new caches lately in Arizona?]
Mimi Philpott
listserv@azgeocaching.com
Tue, 9 Sep 2003 18:28:33 -0700
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_002B_01C37700.2CC32E00
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
or Murphey's
-----Original Message-----
From: az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com
[mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com]On Behalf Of Gale
Draper
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 4:27 PM
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
Subject: Re: [Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why very few new caches lately in
Arizona?]
PLace one at Gurley Street Grill and I'm there.
Regan L Smith <buggers@mindspring.com> wrote:
a better idea let's all carpool with ken and place a cache under every
park
bench in Prescott!!!!!!!!!!
Think people I rather have quality that quantity just placing a cache to
get a find is not a reason to place a cache, I also feel that until you
have
found a minimum of 50 percent of the caches placed in the state, don't
bemoan the point and waste your time which could be better spent on
finding
all those caches that people do place under a park bench and not say on
top
of a hill with a slight cave...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ford, Denny"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 2:05 PM
Subject: RE: [Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why very few new caches lately in
Arizona?]
> With the 1% rule in place I guess the Tres Hombres are safe we are at
1.45%
> that is until I log all the ones I have done and not logged.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Heitowit [mailto:mheitowit@usa.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:46 PM
> To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
> Subject: Re: [Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why very few new caches lately in
> Arizona?]
>
>
> If every team with 100 or more finds were to place 1% of their finds,
there
> would be more caches than Circle K's and Walgreens combined here in
Phoenix.
>
> "Trisha" wrote:
>
> > OK, not to belabor my point (but I guess this will) I just checked
the
> > AZ caching stats. Of the top 25 teams, all with over 350 finds, just
> > over half have hidden LESS THAN 10 caches. I'm not picking on
anybody
> > in particular, but maybe if those who are benefitting the most (most
> > finds) would step up and put out a few more caches (no more excuses!
> > you have over 350 finds!) then it would make Ken happier....?
> > Trisha "Lightning"
> > Prescott
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:02:18 -0700 (PDT), Ken Akerman wrote:
> >
> > I've been looking at the list of new caches, and it appears that
there
> > is very little new cache activity in Arizona during the past week.
> > There have been only two new caches approved in Arizona since Sept.
2,
> > while in Utah there have been 19 new caches approved in the past
seven
> > days.
> >
> > There are many great places to put caches in the high elevations of
> > Arizona. There are still many regions of the state of Arizona that
> > don't have many caches. I may make one or two new caches and hide
them
> > this weekend, potentially near the Mogollon Rim. Don't complain
about< BR>> > the heat in the Phoenix area - the high elevations are less
than two
> > hours away and the gasoline is less expensive in towns like Payson
and
> > Prescott than it is in Phoenix.
> >
> > Why does Utah continue to outpace Arizona in cache activity? Utah
has
> > less than half the population of Arizona, yet Utah has 1,893 caches
as
> > of today, while Arizona has 1,733 caches. We really should have more
> > caches than our neighboring state to the north. (This has always
> > irritated me that Utah has more caches than Arizona. Why should Utah
> > be a better geocaching state than Arizona? I would like to challenge
> > Arizona to become the best geocaching state in the USA).
> >
> > Ken (a.k.a. Highpointer)
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> >
> > Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> > http://www.azgeocaching.com
> >
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com
Tsegi Mike and Desert Viking
Till a voice, as bad as Conscience, rang interminable changes
On one everlasting Whisper day and night repeated -- so:
"Something hidden. Go and find it. Go and look behind the Ranges --
"Something lost behind the Ranges. Lost and waiting for you. Go!"
Rudyard Kipling , The Explorer 1898
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
------=_NextPart_000_002B_01C37700.2CC32E00
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4807.2300" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D710202801-10092003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>or=20
Murphey's</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><FONT =
face=3DTahoma=20
size=3D2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>=20
az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com=20
[mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com]<B>On Behalf Of =
</B>Gale=20
Draper<BR><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, September 09, 2003 4:27 =
PM<BR><B>To:</B>=20
listserv@azgeocaching.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Re: [Az-Geocaching] =
Why very=20
few new caches lately in Arizona?]<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV>PLace one at Gurley Street Grill and I'm =
there.<BR><BR><B><I>Regan L=20
Smith <buggers@mindspring.com></I></B> wrote:=20
<BLOCKQUOTE class=3Dreplbq=20
style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px =
solid">a=20
better idea let's all carpool with ken and place a cache under every =
park<BR>bench in Prescott!!!!!!!!!!<BR><BR><BR><BR>Think people I =
rather=20
have quality that quantity just placing a cache to<BR>get a find is =
not a=20
reason to place a cache, I also feel that until you have<BR>found a =
minimum=20
of 50 percent of the caches placed in the state, don't<BR>bemoan the =
point=20
and waste your time which could be better spent on finding<BR>all =
those=20
caches that people do place under a park bench and not say on =
top<BR>of a=20
hill with a slight cave...<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>----- Original Message =
-----=20
<BR>From: "Ford, Denny" <DENNY.FORD6@HONEYWELL.COM><BR>To:=20
<LISTSERV@AZGEOCACHING.COM><BR>Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 =
2:05=20
PM<BR>Subject: RE: [Re: [Az-Geocaching] Why very few new caches =
lately=20
in<BR>Arizona?]<BR><BR><BR>> With the 1% rule in place I guess =
the Tres=20
Hombres are safe we are at<BR>1.45%<BR>> that is until I log all =
the ones=20
I have done and not logged.<BR>><BR>> -----Original=20
Message-----<BR>> From: Mark Heitowit =
[mailto:mheitowit@usa.net]<BR>>=20
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:46 PM<BR>> To:=20
listserv@azgeocaching.com<BR>> Subject: Re: [Re: [Az-Geocaching] =
Why very=20
few new caches lately in<BR>> Arizona?]<BR>><BR>><BR>> =
If every=20
team with 100 or more finds were to place 1% of their=20
finds,<BR>there<BR>> would be more caches than Circle K's and =
Walgreens=20
combined here in<BR>Phoenix.<BR>><BR>> "Trisha"=20
<TRISHA@BRASHER.COM>wrote:<BR>><BR>> > OK, not to belabor =
my point=20
(but I guess this will) I just checked the<BR>> > AZ caching =
stats. Of=20
the top 25 teams, all with over 350 finds, just<BR>> > over =
half have=20
hidden LESS THAN 10 caches. I'm not picking on anybody<BR>> > =
in=20
particular, but maybe if those who are benefitting the most =
(most<BR>>=20
> finds) would step up and put out a few more caches (no more=20
excuses!<BR>> > you have over 350 finds!) then it would make =
Ken=20
happier....?<BR>> > Trisha "Lightning"<BR>> > =
Prescott<BR>>=20
><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> ><BR>> > On Tue, 9 =
Sep 2003=20
12:02:18 -0700 (PDT), Ken Akerman wrote:<BR>> ><BR>> > =
I've been=20
looking at the list of new caches, and it appears that there<BR>> =
> is=20
very little new cache activity in Arizona during the past =
week.<BR>> >=20
There have been only two new caches approved in Arizona since Sept.=20
2,<BR>> > while in Utah there have been 19 new caches approved =
in the=20
past seven<BR>> > days.<BR>> ><BR>> > There are =
many great=20
places to put caches in the high elevations of<BR>> > Arizona. =
There=20
are still many regions of the state of Arizona that<BR>> > =
don't have=20
many caches. I may make one or two new caches and hide them<BR>> =
>=20
this weekend, potentially near the Mogollon Rim. Don't complain =
about<=20
BR>> > the heat in the Phoenix area - the high elevations =
are less=20
than two<BR>> > hours away and the gasoline is less expensive =
in towns=20
like Payson and<BR>> > Prescott than it is in Phoenix.<BR>> =
><BR>> > Why does Utah continue to outpace Arizona in cache =
activity? Utah has<BR>> > less than half the population of =
Arizona,=20
yet Utah has 1,893 caches as<BR>> > of today, while Arizona =
has 1,733=20
caches. We really should have more<BR>> > caches than our =
neighboring=20
state to the north. (This has always<BR>> > irritated me that =
Utah has=20
more caches than Arizona. Why should Utah<BR>> > be a better=20
geocaching state than Arizona? I would like to challenge<BR>> =
>=20
Arizona to become the best geocaching state in the USA).<BR>>=20
><BR>> > Ken (a.k.a. Highpointer)<BR>> >=20
____________________________________________________________<BR>> =
>=20
Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com<BR>> > To =
edit=20
your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:<BR>> >=20
=
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching<BR>>=20
><BR>> > Arizona's Geocaching Resource<BR>> >=20
http://www.azgeocaching.com<BR>> =
><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>>=20
____________________________________________________________<BR>> =
Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com<BR>> To edit =
your=20
setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:<BR>>=20
=
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching<BR>><B=
R>>=20
Arizona's Geocaching Resource<BR>> =
http://www.azgeocaching.com<BR>>=20
____________________________________________________________<BR>> =
Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com<BR>> To edit =
your=20
setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:<BR>>=20
=
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching<BR>><B=
R>>=20
Arizona's Geocaching Resource<BR>>=20
=
http://www.azgeocaching.com<BR><BR>______________________________________=
______________________<BR>Az-Geocaching=20
mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com<BR>To edit your setting, =
subscribe or=20
unsubscribe=20
=
visit:<BR>http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching=
<BR><BR>Arizona's=20
Geocaching =
Resource<BR>http://www.azgeocaching.com</BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR><BR>
<DIV>
<DIV>Tsegi Mike and Desert Viking</DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#6633cc></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#6633cc>Till a voice, as bad as Conscience, rang =
interminable=20
changes<BR> On one everlasting Whisper day and night repeated -- =
so:<BR>"Something hidden. Go and find it. Go and look behind the =
Ranges=20
--<BR> "Something lost behind the Ranges. Lost and waiting for =
you.=20
Go!"</FONT></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#6633cc></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV><FONT color=3D#6633cc>Rudyard Kipling , The =
Explorer =20
1898</FONT></DIV></DIV>
<P>
<HR SIZE=3D1>
Do you Yahoo!?<BR><A=20
=
href=3D"http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=3D10469/*http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com"=
>Yahoo!=20
SiteBuilder</A> - Free, easy-to-use web site design=20
software</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_002B_01C37700.2CC32E00--