[Az-Geocaching] New trend in geocaching? Must be easily findable?

[AZcachemeister]

Thanks for pointing this out, so I can add that cache to THAT list.  :-X

AZcachemeister
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Gale wrote:
> A recent stink on the national forums was about a cache that had not 
> been found in the two years of its existence despite many attempts. 
> Cachers were concerned that it might happen again.
>
> It did. Here in Az. GC21D5M 
> <http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?guid=79ded575-ac65-459b-8ac9-1d3fe9767b09&log=y&decrypt=> 
> Folks were looking for this 2 day old cache and not finding it. Now 
> its been disabled by the reviewer because it had too many DNFs, so the 
> owner can check on it, despite the fact that the owner checked on it 
> twice. Is this a new trend in geocaching? All caches must be easily 
> findable by most people?
>
> Tsegi Mike and Desert Viking
>  
> Till a voice, as bad as Conscience, rang interminable changes
>   On one everlasting Whisper day and night repeated -- so:
> "Something hidden.  Go and find it. Go and look behind the Ranges --
>   "Something lost behind the Ranges. Lost and waiting for you. Go!"
>  
> Rudyard Kipling ,   The Explorer  1898
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/20091130/b393a44e/attachment.htm>