[Az-Geocaching] New trend in geocaching? Must be easily findable?

[Mark Fleming]

Sometimes it seems to be that people feel it's their 'right' to find a
cache. There are some you are likely never to find, for one reason or
another. Nothing in the rules guarantee that every cache seeker is able to
find every cache.

Just my two cents.

GoNorthWest

On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Gale <sonoralovesmommy at yahoo.com> wrote:

> A recent stink on the national forums was about a cache that had not been
> found in the two years of its existence despite many attempts. Cachers were
> concerned that it might happen again.
>
> It did. Here in Az. GC21D5M<http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?guid=79ded575-ac65-459b-8ac9-1d3fe9767b09&log=y&decrypt=>Folks were looking for this 2 day old cache and not finding it. Now its been
> disabled by the reviewer because it had too many DNFs, so the owner can
> check on it, despite the fact that the owner checked on it twice. Is this a
> new trend in geocaching? All caches must be easily findable by most people?
>
> Tsegi Mike and Desert Viking
>
> Till a voice, as bad as Conscience, rang interminable changes
>   On one everlasting Whisper day and night repeated -- so:
> "Something hidden.  Go and find it. Go and look behind the Ranges --
>   "Something lost behind the Ranges. Lost and waiting for you. Go!"
>
> Rudyard Kipling ,   The Explorer  1898
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>


-- 
Mark S Fleming
http://www.outdoor-resources.com/SW_Trails/
Twitter : GoNorthWest
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/20091128/1197c3d3/attachment.htm>