[Az-Geocaching] New Fake cache logger - FYI

AZcachemeister azcachemeister at getnet.net
Tue Mar 17 20:46:38 CDT 2009


Or hide a new cache of your own close by and call it 'No Sevens at all' 
or 'Holding Sevens', etc. to block the area. Once the construction is 
finished, you have a decision to make...

AZcachemeister wrote:
> HMMM! Yes, a possibility I hadn't considered. Perhaps you should 
> either be more insistent that it be returned to temp disabled status, 
> or write up a new cache at the same location and not check the 
> 'ACTIVE' checkbox. I understand the reviewers can see 'caches in 
> progress', and will respect the claim to the location for a time. No 
> telling if that would work in this case.
>
> ACM
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Jake Olson wrote:
>> But while it's archived, another cache can be placed within the 528ft 
>> radius.  My point was that I was trying to hold the area until the 
>> construction was complete and evaluate reactivating it or archiving 
>> the cache myself.  I can't do that if another cache has encroached.  
>> It's the same reason I didn't move it... the Mostly 7's name would 
>> lose its significance if it's moved.
>>
>> Jake - Team A.I.
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Rich B <azicn09 at gmail.com 
>> <mailto:azicn09 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     That is good to know - we have a cache we want to un-archive and
>>     place a "less conspicuous" container for it.  Will keep this in mind.
>>
>>
>>     On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 5:26 PM, AZcachemeister
>>     <azcachemeister at getnet.net> wrote:
>>
>>         Jake,
>>         and Bob,
>>         Once your caches are repaired/replaced, they can be
>>         unarchived and put back in service.
>>         An EMail to our reviewer (with a link to the cache page
>>         included for convenience) stating that the cache is fixed
>>         should result in unarchival.
>>         Worst case scenario is you would need to 'hide' a 'new' cache
>>         at the same location.
>>         The speed with which disabled caches are archived is
>>         pretty-much left up to the local reviewer, and is not
>>         mandated by Groundspeak/Geocaching.com.
>>         With around 500 caches */a month/* being published  in
>>         Arizona alone (I could only guess how many are submitted) our
>>         reviewer is overworked and under paid, and should be
>>         screaming for some help. With that kind of pressure, some
>>         errors of judgment are bound to creep in.
>>
>>         Back on topic. Once a virtual is archived, it's gone for
>>         good. :'(
>>
>>         ACM
>>         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>         Jake Olson wrote:
>>>         Similarly, they archived one of my caches that I disabled
>>>         due to construction in the area.  I posted a note on the
>>>         cache before the archive stating that I was wanting to hold
>>>         the cache disabled until the construction was complete to
>>>         re-evaluate archiving it myself then. I sent a subsequent
>>>         note to the approver that archived it which went ignored, or
>>>         at least un-responded to.
>>>
>>>         The cache was named "Mostly 7's" and ended with 4 sevens in
>>>         both the longitude and latitude.  Moving the cache to an
>>>         adjacent location would have undermined the whole concept of
>>>         the placement.
>>>
>>>         Jake - Team A.I.
>>>
>>>         On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Bob & Linda Smith
>>>         <Lrsmith at cableone.net <mailto:Lrsmith at cableone.net>> wrote:
>>>
>>>             I think I must agree here that some things GC see as
>>>             needing heavy-handedness.  They decided to archive one
>>>             of my caches that I temporally archived because I had
>>>             not replaced it within 30 days.  I explained in a note
>>>             that I was laid up with a serious leg injury and would
>>>             get to it asap.  I don't think they read that but just
>>>             acted on the flag on my tempory archive.  Which by the
>>>             way must be fairly new as they threatened to archive
>>>             another of my caches when I temporally archived it over
>>>             a year ago and the flag just popped up.  I found that I
>>>             needed to post a different kind of log other than just a
>>>             note.
>>>              
>>>             I still look after a couple of caches for away owner
>>>             that are close to me.
>>>              
>>>             Anyway, we get a note whenever our caches are logged on
>>>             line and should act on the note if needed.
>>>              
>>>             Jumping off box onto bad leg Ouch!!
>>>             Bob Smith, Team Petite Elite, Prescott, AZ
>>>
>>>
>>>         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>         ____________________________________________________________
>>>         Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
>>>         <mailto:listserv at azgeocaching.com> To edit your setting,
>>>         subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
>>>         http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>>>         Arizona's Geocaching Resource http://www.azgeocaching.com
>>
>>         ____________________________________________________________
>>         Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
>>         <mailto:listserv at azgeocaching.com>
>>         To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
>>         http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>>
>>         Arizona's Geocaching Resource
>>         http://www.azgeocaching.com
>>
>>
>>
>>     ____________________________________________________________
>>     Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
>>     <mailto:listserv at azgeocaching.com>
>>     To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
>>     http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>>
>>     Arizona's Geocaching Resource
>>     http://www.azgeocaching.com
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
>> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
>> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>>
>> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
>> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/20090317/89b5a54c/attachment.htm>


More information about the Az-Geocaching mailing list