[Az-Geocaching] Another cache bites the dust

Richard Hansen richard.hansen at dos2unix.net
Mon Nov 17 16:03:57 MST 2008


I agree.

Reading what Regan has posted, a geocache does not seem to fall in any category ... though "litter" would need a definition.



=
Richard Hansen
________________________________________
From: az-geocaching-bounces at listserv.azgeocaching.com [az-geocaching-bounces at listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of Randy Kinkel [ark45 at cox.net]
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 4:03 PM
To: listserv at azgeocaching.com
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Another cache bites the dust

most caches do not fit the "destructive or injurious material" test. IMO.  but I'm no lawyer.

mozartman
----- Original Message -----
From: Regan Smith<mailto:evilfish at cox.net>
To: listserv at azgeocaching.com<mailto:listserv at azgeocaching.com>
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Another cache bites the dust

13-1603. Criminal littering or polluting; classification

A. A person commits criminal littering or polluting if such person without lawful authority does any of the following:

1. Throws, places, drops or permits to be dropped on public property or property of another which is not a lawful dump any litter, destructive or injurious material which he does not immediately remove.

2. Discharges or permits to be discharged any sewage, oil products or other harmful substances into any waters or onto any shorelines within the state.

3. Dumps any earth, soil, stones, ores or minerals on any land.

B. Criminal littering or polluting is punished as follows:

1. A class 6 felony if a knowing violation of subsection A in which the amount of litter or other prohibited material or substance exceeds three hundred pounds in weight or one hundred cubic feet in volume or is done in any quantity for a commercial purpose.

2. A class 1 misdemeanor if the act is not punishable under paragraph 1 of this subsection and involves placing any destructive or injurious material on or within fifty feet of a highway, beach or shoreline of any body of water used by the public.

3. A class 2 misdemeanor if not punishable under paragraph 1 or 2 of this subsection.


Jim Scotti wrote:

So, has anyone looked up the A.R.S. code listed on the stickers?  I'd be
curious to hear what it has to say exactly and how it might be interpretted
in these two cases.

Jim.

On Mon, 17 Nov 2008, Gale wrote:



Link to cache log

Looks like the geocaching cop/pirate has hit another cache, this one in
Mesa.

I do not think its real cops. Anyone with real authority would have gone
directly to geocaching website and contacted them. This is just someone who
printed up stickers and is throwing his or her weight around. Anyone have
legal training or knows a lawyer? Perhaps we can get a legal opinion on
this.

Gale aka Desert Viking



I'm not normally a religious man, but if you're up there, save me,
Superman! - Homer Simpson
----------
Jim Scotti
Lunar & Planetary Laboratory
University of Arizona
Tucson, AZ 85721 USA                 http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~jscotti/
____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com<mailto:listserv at azgeocaching.com>
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching

Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com




E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.0.0.386)
Database version: 5.11140
http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor-antivirus/



________________________________

____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching

Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com


More information about the Az-Geocaching mailing list