[Az-Geocaching] Opinions on a cache

[Team Sprocket]

Yeah, it's wrong (IMHO).  The same applies to highway guardrails and road
signs.  If you have to disassemble a public or private structure then you
are committing vandalism, as far as I'm concerned.   Now if the cache hider
provides the hardware, I think it might be different.

And yes, we as cachers need to police ourselves.  If we don't then others in
authority will take it upon themselves and their solution will be to outlaw
caching altogether in their particular area of jurisdiction.

 From: ShadowAce <shadowace.az at gmail.com>
> Subject: [Az-Geocaching] Opinions on a cache
> To: listserv at azgeocaching.com
> Message-ID:
>        <29fc9f950811302115m25228a70w432137e55b76636f at mail.gmail.com >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Ok, this just strikes me as wrong, so I wondered what others think.
>
> City park bench and the cache owner has removed a large dome nut from the
> bench.
> They placed a very tiny piece of paper inside the dome nut and placed it
> back on.
>
> To 'find and sign the cache' one must remove nuts from the city benches
> until you find the correct one.
>
> Am I the only one who thinks parks and recreation might have a problem with
> caches such as this?
>


There's really nothing unique about it.  I've seen the same type  of cache
more times than I can remember (just not  on a park bench.)

 From: "Mark Fleming" <mrkfleming at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Opinions on a cache
> To: listserv at azgeocaching.com
> Message-ID:
>        <e46777f0811302217o4b755313p1bb919c5cf030747 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Sorry...given the information, I thought the cache description noted this
> unique approach to a cache. It apparently did not.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/20081201/6f8f996b/attachment.htm