[Az-Geocaching] Adopting a cache

[Brian Casteel]

Makes sense.  I suppose then it could be submitted as a new cache with a 
link built into the description for the old cache, but maybe call it by 
the same name?

Brian
Team A.I.


ShadowAce wrote:
> Basically to drop all the other spam that this became....
>
>  I would say this IMHO:
>
>  New owner, New Cache, New Log. = New Cache
>
>  Old Container, Old Log, New Owner = Reactivate.
>
>  Since this cache is not the cache in question, it really is a new 
> cache, new hide and as such deserves a new history.
>
>  Thats my opinion and I like it, your feelings will vary.
>
> On 5/4/07, *Bob & Linda Smith* <Lrsmith at cableone.net 
> <mailto:Lrsmith at cableone.net>> wrote:
>
>     OK everyone, I need to find out why an archived cache can't be
>     un-archived so the adopt program can be used.  I am trying to get a
>     cache back on line that the original owner can no longer maintain.  I
>     was told by Michael LaPaglia at GC.com that once a cache is
>     archived it
>     can not be un-archived.  I am pretty sure that I read somewhere
>     that a
>     cache could be un-archived and brought back on line.  If you want to
>     look at the cache on line the way point is GCJWPV
>
>
>     Bob and Linda Smith, Team Petite Elite
>     Prescott, AZ
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG. 
> Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.5/791 - Release Date: 5/6/2007 9:07 AM
>