[Az-Geocaching] finding geocaches that neither of two (or more) teams have found

[ShadowAce]

According to my GSAK database AZPaul has 173 'Found it' logs. So it would be
real easy for me to hunt caches with him as this means he has many many
unfound in the state. :)

 Or wait.. does it mean I dont have all his finds in my dataset? :-)

Team Nine Lives has 260 finds according to my GSAK data.

On 1/12/07, ShadowAce <shadowace.az at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This will work well, if you are going for a cache that is not found very
> often or if you download the GPS file often enough to have every log in it.
> If your caching buddy has found the cache a long time ago, they may or may
> not have a log in your download depending on when others found it.
>
>  I believe a manual GPX download will contain the last 20 logs while a PQ
> download should have something like the last 5 logs.
>
>  With this in mind if your planning a cache run in an area with commonly
> hit caches it is possible your buddy has a find that is not going to show up
> in your gsak updates.
>
> On 1/12/07, AZPAUL <azpaul1 at cox.net> wrote:
> >
> > You can to it in GSAK, by filtering your target list of caches using the
> > include/exclude filter located under the logs tab in the filter screen.
> > ____________________________________________________________
> > Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
> > To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> > http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> >
> > Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> > http://www.azgeocaching.com
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/20070112/e87f8f15/attachment.htm