[Az-Geocaching] Poll

Wogun1 wogun1 at cox.net
Thu Mar 17 22:10:12 MST 2005


Ok, I know this is off the subject of tc vs gc.... but what is a challenge
point cache?  And how does it become a challenge point cache? And are there
other statistical websites out there that we haven't stumbled across in the
last six months?  
 
We have just been merrily caching along and had no idea such a thing
existed! 
 
Terry 
wogunhiker

  _____  

From: az-geocaching-bounces at listserv.azgeocaching.com
[mailto:az-geocaching-bounces at listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of David
Thompsen
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 8:23 PM
To: listserv at azgeocaching.com; Guy Aldrich
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Poll


Guy Aldrich <graldrich at gmail.com> wrote: 

Dave, could you please explain what you mean by"TC.com leaves a bad
taste in my mouth ?


Sure. I guess you're kind of becoming an unofficial spokesman for TC.com,
since you and your wife now own more TC's than everyone else in the state
combined. 
 
I'll start at the top. From the Terracaching site, here are some of the
things they offer that you don't get at other sites.  
 
(the following is from their confusing FAQ)
..."TPS points, MCE/UCR ratings, Locationless caches, and the breathing room
to post fun, quality caches that don't always fit within the other site's
"guidelines"....
 
1) TPS points & MCE/UCR ratings.  I start to go a little cross-eyed when I
look at the formulae they use to try to determine this.  I'd rather do the
1040 long form.  I suppose they're trying to say that they have a
competitive scoring system in place. Ok, great.  As far as Arizona's
concerned, I've been pleasantly surprised by Noshdoo Tsoh' excellent Arizona
Challenge Points page. (http://www.deepsouthwest.com/geocaching/stats/)  I
didn't like it at first, but over time it grew on me, and gives an
interesting take on the relative difficulty of caches.  I prefer it to the
TPS structure for my state.  MCE/UCR ratings?  I suppose these are feedback
and participation ratings.  Again, the formulae are enough to make you go
nuts.  My favorite part of their FAQ even compares UCR ratings to a pyramid
scheme.
 
2)  Locationless caches.  OK, so they have 'em ... GC.com has some, and
keeps mentioning some new replacement concept for them in the
(indeterminate) future.  If you absolutely positively HAVE to have
locationless, I guess this is a tilt in TC.com's favor.  Realistically, I
think that LC's are, for the most part, an extremely minor or nonexistent
part of most cachers life. I've done my share of locationless.  They're a
neat idea, but not the focus of my caching experience at all.
 
3) "breathing room to post fun, quality caches that don't always fit within
the other site's "guidelines"....  Here's where the site owner gets a little
snarky.  It's no surprise to me that he used to be an avid cacher on "the
other site" :) , decided to start TC.com, plagiarized their legalese, got
banned, and now goes by the name of "Angry Kid". Hrm.   This is where I
start to get the feeling of elitism, of the chip on the shoulder, of "I'm
taking my toys somewhere else".  Whatever makes you happy --- but if you
take your toys elsewhere, play nicely.  Don't lob spitballs at the old base
camp.
 
Other things that confuse me :
 
4)  This is the index to the site.
(http://www.terracaching.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=623)
Notice how section 3, "Acceptable Cache Guidelines", has no hyperlink?  Are
there any cache guidelines at all?  Or can you post any cache you want as
long as you find two sponsors?  Two buddies? If I make two more Terracaching
sock puppets, I should theoretically be able to post a cache full of porn,
crack vials, Satanist pamphlets, and broken glass next to an active military
installation.  I could list every fact about this clearly wrong cache ---
but as long as my sponsors are willing co-conspirators, it'll go up live on
the site as an approved cache.
 
[Now my hypothetical example might eventually disappear, but the mechanisms
of cache archival over there look like they take a looooooooong time.]
 
Sometimes you lose the battle within GC.com's guidelines.  I would argue
that having guidelines and designated approvers beats the alternative of the
slight anarchy I see over there.  
 
---
 
These are SOME of the reasons that _at_this_time_  I'm not interested in
TC.com.  I reserve the right to change my mind if it seems to improve in the
future.  No one should feel obligated to belong just one site. No one should
feel the need to discuss just one site on the listserv.  If I hear amazing
things about caches that they offer that just knock my socks off, maybe I'll
change my mind.
 
But I'm not holding my breath.
 
--Dave, The Cow Spots
 

 


  _____  

Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=31637/*http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
> our new resources site! 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserv.sequoia.net/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/20050317/6eaa1517/attachment.htm


More information about the Az-Geocaching mailing list