[Az-Geocaching] FTF on my new cache

EvilFISH EvilFish at cox.net
Wed Apr 13 18:34:55 MST 2005


actually any clues or coords?? or is the cache at the stated location
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rush Harley" <rlharley at hotmail.com>
To: <az-geocaching at listserv.azgeocaching.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 7:19 PM
Subject: [Az-Geocaching] FTF on my new cache


> To all...
> as of 4:00pm Saturday, the log was not signed...
> Next weekend, I'm told, an even MORE spectacular event will be 
> held...somthing about 'DURATION' No fair helping EvilFish! (LOL) I'll be 
> there to watch because...I don't really have a life!
> ®ioexxo
>
>
>
>
> GAS PRICES   and Timing is everything.........
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "AZcachemeister" <azcachemeister at getnet.com>
> To: <listserv at azgeocaching.com>
> Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 7:50 AM
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] FTF on my newest cache (GCN3W5)
>
>
>>Which indicates TEF shoulda been first!
>>
>>Steven Stringham wrote:
>>
>>>How were the launches today?
>>>
>>>Rush Harley wrote:
>>>
>>>>I have to admit... I'm a little dissapointed that no intrepid Geocacher 
>>>>attempted my latests hide.
>>>>O.K., so maybe the name thew you off(L.R.M.), but I was betting 
>>>>AzJammin, that FlatIron or A.J. jr would be the first.. :(
>>>>
>>>>This Cache is a PERFECT example of why calling a cache a L.U.M or L.R.M. 
>>>>ignores the greater significance of it's placement. owing to the fact 
>>>>that 'Virtual' Caches are far and few.. I have resoted to another kind 
>>>>of bait. If anyone would have read the clue, and actually followed the 
>>>>directions,  ...they would have wittnessed a GRAND SITE!!!
>>>>What cache you ask????
>>>>GCN3W5
>>>>®ioexxo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>____________________________________________________________
>>>>Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
>>>>To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
>>>>http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>>>>
>>>>Arizona's Geocaching Resource
>>>>http://www.azgeocaching.com
>>>
>>>
>>>____________________________________________________________
>>>Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
>>>To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
>>>http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>>>
>>>Arizona's Geocaching Resource
>>>http://www.azgeocaching.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>____________________________________________________________
>>Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
>>To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
>>http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>>
>>Arizona's Geocaching Resource
>>http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 19:52:40 -0700
> From: "EvilFISH" <EvilFish at cox.net>
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] FTF on my newest cache (GCN3W5)
> To: <listserv at azgeocaching.com>
> Message-ID: <002c01c53f0a$b110ac90$1b1a0244 at fishkiller>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=response
>
> http://www.sssrocketry.org/
>
>
> on my favorites list
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "AZcachemeister" <azcachemeister at getnet.com>
> To: <listserv at azgeocaching.com>
> Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 7:50 AM
> Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] FTF on my newest cache (GCN3W5)
>
>
>>Which indicates TEF shoulda been first!
>>
>>Steven Stringham wrote:
>>
>>>How were the launches today?
>>>
>>>Rush Harley wrote:
>>>
>>>>I have to admit... I'm a little dissapointed that no intrepid Geocacher 
>>>>attempted my latests hide.
>>>>O.K., so maybe the name thew you off(L.R.M.), but I was betting 
>>>>AzJammin, that FlatIron or A.J. jr would be the first.. :(
>>>>
>>>>This Cache is a PERFECT example of why calling a cache a L.U.M or L.R.M. 
>>>>ignores the greater significance of it's placement. owing to the fact 
>>>>that 'Virtual' Caches are far and few.. I have resoted to another kind 
>>>>of bait. If anyone would have read the clue, and actually followed the 
>>>>directions,  ...they would have wittnessed a GRAND SITE!!!
>>>>What cache you ask????
>>>>GCN3W5
>>>>®ioexxo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>____________________________________________________________
>>>>Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
>>>>To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
>>>>http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>>>>
>>>>Arizona's Geocaching Resource
>>>>http://www.azgeocaching.com
>>>
>>>
>>>____________________________________________________________
>>>Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
>>>To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
>>>http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>>>
>>>Arizona's Geocaching Resource
>>>http://www.azgeocaching.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>____________________________________________________________
>>Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
>>To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
>>http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>>
>>Arizona's Geocaching Resource
>>http://www.azgeocaching.com
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 04:16:24 +0000
> From: "Rush Harley" <rlharley at hotmail.com>
> Subject: [Az-Geocaching] FTF on my newest cache
> To: az-geocaching at listserv.azgeocaching.com
> Message-ID: <BAY101-F3018034ED704EE872D0F67DA330 at phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
>
> AZcachemeister ... YOU are CORRECT! LOL
> As for the "lunch's" (tringCachers I believe...) whatever do you mean..
> hehehe
>
> I'm still in a fog from the beautiful Cochran Campout Cache.......
>
> ®ioexxo
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 02:40:28 -0700
> From: Scott Sparks <scottsparks1 at mchsi.com>
> Subject: [Az-Geocaching] Re: FTF on my newest cache (GCN3W5)
> To: az-geocaching at listserv.azgeocaching.com
> Message-ID: <425B978C.6060900 at mchsi.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> If gas wasn't so darn expensive,  >:o  I'd have been all over that one
> weeks ago!  As it is, it's a bit out of range for a quick drive-by to
> snag a FTF.   Direct Route(tm)  says it's about 73.3 miles from my
> house.  With the 10 mpg I get in my truck and gas at about $2.30
> /gallon, that's a FTF that would cost me about $34! :-$   And there's no
> guarantee I'll get there first.  In fact, it may have already been found
> but not yet logged.  Some people have been known to delay logging their
> FTF's as a cruel joke on the 2nd finder.  ;-) But I wouldn't know
> anything about that. O:-)
>
> -- Sprocket
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com 



More information about the Az-Geocaching mailing list