[Az-Geocaching] If It's Not a Find, What Is It Then?

[Ford, Denny]

I am finally going to speak up,
The ethical question only comes about because people are too worried about the stupid numbers and not the actual
enjoyment of finding the cache.  I admit I was one of those, but if you don't look at the numbers, does it really matter
whether or not you find the cache.  I can be a challenge on ones that are very difficult to reach or to grab due to high
traffic or difficulty where it takes you three or four times to sign the log.  I agree the DNF should be left in tact
and quit worrying about the numbers and just enjoy the journey.  
 
 
recovering GEOholic
 
Tres Hombres
Denny

  _____  

From: az-geocaching-bounces at listserv.azgeocaching.com [mailto:az-geocaching-bounces at listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf
Of SSpackeen at aol.com
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 4:34 PM
To: listserv at azgeocaching.com
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] If It's Not a Find, What Is It Then?


I'm new to this (chatty) group, having only found it a couple of weeks ago, and this ethical question is amusing.
 
DNF's should be left intact.  Subsequent successes should be logged but previous DNFs should remain.  
 
I log all DNFs as they occur.  If I find the right spot but encounter a specific problem (lost or destroyed cache, no
log book, missing identifiers, etc.) that prevents me from claiming a find, I will just post a note in this case wait
for a response.  
 
Several weeks ago I found a spot and I found the piece of wood that was supposed to direct me to the second stage.  The
writing on the wood was washed-out, so this was not really a DNF.  I posted a note and the owner has not responded, so I
haven't returned either.  
 
 
In a message dated 12/9/2004 3:13:49 P.M. US Mountain Standard Time, scott at myblueheaven.com writes:

At 06:09 AM 12/8/2004, you wrote:
>This is my log from "AurorArborealis", which you just finished.  It 
>started out as a DNF and became a found log, while still retaining the 
>history of the cache.
>
>I agree with your point of view about not erasing logs 100%  I just handle 
>it a little differently, and if a cache owner wanted me to have my find 
>and my DNF on his page, I'd cheerfully comply.
>

I think you handled that just fine.  What I have seen a lot of people do is 
completely wipe out their DNF or Note log and replace it with the find one 
once they did find it.  I think that both logs should stay in place. 


____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv at azgeocaching.com
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching

Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com


 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserv.sequoia.net/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/20041209/1354f2dc/attachment.htm