[Az-Geocaching] If It's Not a Find, What Is It Then?

[Steve Burton]

The main problem (for me) is that the owner does not automatically 
receive a copy of the edited log as (s)he would if it were a new entry.

David Thompsen wrote:

> This is my log from "AurorArborealis", which you just finished.  It 
> started out as a DNF and became a found log, while still retaining the 
> history of the cache.
>  
> I agree with your point of view about not erasing logs 100%  I just 
> handle it a little differently, and if a cache owner wanted me to have 
> my find and my DNF on his page, I'd cheerfully comply.
>  
> --Dave
>  
>  
> ---
> 12/3
>
> If at first you don't succeed... try try again. My luck lately seems 
> to be better on 2nd go arounds. Found after 10 mins today, excellent 
> cache combining elements of mental and physical ability. SL.
>
> 12/2
>
> After staring at this cache page periodically over the last couple of 
> months, it finally made perfect sense. Went to visit in the afternoon 
> and could only search for a few minutes due to time constraints and an 
> overzealous rent-a-cop in the area. Very clever puzzle, now for the 
> hide! This cache is very close to lunch break recon, so I hope to log 
> it soon.
> ---
>
>
> *//*
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserv.sequoia.net/pipermail/az-geocaching/attachments/20041208/073dba31/attachment.htm