[Az-Geocaching] Co Admin

[Loran Wilcox]

I have no problems with virtuals but I can see why they try to limit them.
A lot of the early virtual where placed by cachers on vacation that knew
that they could not maintain a traditional cache.  Many of these spots would
make a great traditional or a stage of a multi but since a virtual was there
that was no longer an option.

The main type of cache was one with a container but the sport grew to
include other types.  Virtuals are nice and have there place but if a
container can be placed there it should.

So the simple rule of thumb is that if the site is suitable for a container
it should have one.  And if it has a container it should be maintained.
Virtuals should only be placed when there is no other options.  I totally
agree with the no vacation rule because I've seen to many caches that go to
trash because there is no one to maintain it.

Yes I still have a cache in AZ and no I can not personally can not maintain
it.  But I have made arrangements with another team to check on it if there
is a problem.  Some day I do hole to be able to return but for now it is
still active so I will leave it.

Team Sand Dollar

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Carol King" <krcd@qwest.net>
To: <az-geocaching@listserv.azgeocaching.com>
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 9:58 PM
Subject: [Az-Geocaching] Co Admin


> I agree with Scott - CO admin  may be nice, but he sure is a control
> freak! After trying to place a really neat virtual in CO instead of a
> traditional as we are only up there once a year, I got put down for not
> making it a traditional, and then he denied it because it was a
> "vacation" cache anyway. I think their new rule about vacation caches is
> unfair and vague - especially for those of us who travel in RV's
> extensively.  What if we have a home state like TX because of taxes, but
> spend our summers in CO, UT and MN(or others), and winter in AZ?  Are we
> stuck to placing caches only in TX, and what is our perimeter, 25, 50
> miles of our PO Box address or the whole state?  Why are they so against
> virtuals, which are usually very educational and entertaining? I just
> don't understand their reasoning, and what recourse do we the cachers
> have?  Does anyone know where we can express our opinion? Regards, Team
> Safari
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com