[Az-Geocaching] Virtuals

Regan L Smith listserv@azgeocaching.com
Sat, 4 Oct 2003 06:33:49 -0700


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C38A41.78851200
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

We want to add our congratulations as well=20


and I will add that there seems to me that there is a series of similar =
caches in the Phoenix area like how many full size caches IE TACKLE BOX =
have been placed, in the past 4 months??? I read a few months ago =
someone in their log wrote ARIZONA MUST HAVE THE BEST BREATHE, should we =
have a micro on every corner of the valley of the sun??? why not a =
bigger cache in a better location, not more.....
yes there are caches available but all the same???
  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: xWaterLilyx=20
  To: listserv@azgeocaching.com=20
  Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2003 12:10 AM
  Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Virtuals=20


  Ok, I've been reading through a few of these, I've been out of touch =
the past couple of weeks due to real life (got married and went on a =
honeymoon - geocaching here and there of course) and I felt I just had =
to put in my 2 cents worth.

  I personally LOVE historical sites, I don't care if there is a real =
cache there, if it's a virtual, a locationless, or even a benchmark.  I =
have also wondered why they didn't just make the virtuals a different =
category altogether like they have with benchmarks and locationless =
ones.

  I do enjoying the historical markers when on trips because they give =
me a great excuse to get out of the car and walk around a bit, otherwise =
I tend to drive without stopping (and if I do stop I'm rarely getting =
out of the truck to do more then get gas, get back in and keep driving.)

  Everybody is different and enjoys many different things, geocaching =
overall reflects this with wide variety of caches available.

  Larry H <friared1@yahoo.com> wrote:
    http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=3D27120
    > >I've
    > >found a few virtuals and couldn't tell you what I
    > >'learned' at any of them.=20

    Ok, you caught me. How ironic that you post one of my
    logs as proof that people do learn something at
    virtuals. This cache in particular COULD support a
    real cache as there are plenty of hiding spots. The
    question is, SHOULD it? I think the answer is no. This
    is such a small town that travelling cachers would be
    stopped by the neighbors and/or police if they were
    picking around the monument looking for a container.

    All that aside, if virtuals had 'their own section'
    like benchmarks, I don't think there would be a
    problem with a virtual blocking a traditional cache.
    Benchmarks can be inche s away from a container without
    the admins saying the 'spot' is taken. Why not do the
    same with virtuals?

    Team GPSaxophone

    =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
    FriarED




  xWaterLilyx & RTF
  Team H20
  Phoenix, AZ (Ahwatukee)

  Geocaching Site: http://www.geocities.com/xwaterlilyxrtf


-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-----
  Do you Yahoo!?
  The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C38A41.78851200
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1170" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>We want to add our congratulations as =
well=20
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>and I will add that there seems to me =
that there is=20
a series of similar caches in the Phoenix area like how many full size =
caches IE=20
TACKLE BOX have been placed, in the past 4 months??? I read a few months =
ago=20
someone in their log wrote ARIZONA MUST HAVE THE BEST BREATHE, should we =
have a=20
micro on every corner of the valley of the sun??? why not a bigger cache =
in a=20
better location, not more.....</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>yes there are caches available but all =
the=20
same???</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Dxwaterlilyxrtf@yahoo.com=20
  href=3D"mailto:xwaterlilyxrtf@yahoo.com">xWaterLilyx</A> </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dlistserv@azgeocaching.com=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:listserv@azgeocaching.com">listserv@azgeocaching.com</A> =
</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, October 04, =
2003 12:10=20
  AM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Az-Geocaching] =
Virtuals=20
  </DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV>Ok, I've been reading through a few of these, I've been out of =
touch the=20
  past couple of weeks due to real life (got married and went on a =
honeymoon -=20
  geocaching here and there of course) and I felt I just had to put in =
my 2=20
  cents worth.</DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>I personally LOVE historical sites, I don't care if there is a =
real cache=20
  there, if it's a virtual, a locationless, or even a benchmark.&nbsp; I =
have=20
  also wondered why they didn't just make the virtuals a different =
category=20
  altogether like they have with benchmarks and locationless ones.</DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>I do enjoying the historical markers when on trips because they =
give me a=20
  great excuse to get out of the car and walk around a bit, otherwise I =
tend to=20
  drive without stopping (and if I do stop I'm rarely getting out of the =
truck=20
  to do more then get gas, get back in and keep driving.)</DIV>
  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
  <DIV>Everybody is different and enjoys many different things, =
geocaching=20
  overall reflects this with wide variety of caches=20
  available.<BR><BR><B><I>Larry H &lt;friared1@yahoo.com&gt;</I></B>=20
wrote:</DIV>
  <BLOCKQUOTE class=3Dreplbq=20
  style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px =
solid"><A=20
    =
href=3D"http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=3D27120">htt=
p://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=3D27120</A><BR>&gt;=20
    &gt;I've<BR>&gt; &gt;found a few virtuals and couldn't tell you what =

    I<BR>&gt; &gt;'learned' at any of them. <BR><BR>Ok, you caught me. =
How=20
    ironic that you post one of my<BR>logs as proof that people do learn =

    something at<BR>virtuals. This cache in particular COULD support =
a<BR>real=20
    cache as there are plenty of hiding spots. The<BR>question is, =
SHOULD it? I=20
    think the answer is no. This<BR>is such a small town that travelling =
cachers=20
    would be<BR>stopped by the neighbors and/or police if they =
were<BR>picking=20
    around the monument looking for a container.<BR><BR>All that aside, =
if=20
    virtuals had 'their own section'<BR>like benchmarks, I don't think =
there=20
    would be a<BR>problem with a virtual blocking a traditional=20
    cache.<BR>Benchmarks can be inche s away from a container =
without<BR>the=20
    admins saying the 'spot' is taken. Why not do the<BR>same with=20
    virtuals?<BR><BR>Team=20
  =
GPSaxophone<BR><BR>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D<BR>FriarED<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><BR=
>xWaterLilyx=20
  &amp; RTF<BR>Team H20<BR>Phoenix, AZ (Ahwatukee)<BR><BR>Geocaching =
Site:=20
  http://www.geocities.com/xwaterlilyxrtf
  <P>
  <HR SIZE=3D1>
  Do you Yahoo!?<BR><A=20
  =
href=3D"http://shopping.yahoo.com/?__yltc=3Ds%3A150000443%2Cd%3A22708228%=
2Cslk%3Atext%2Csec%3Amail">The=20
  New Yahoo! Shopping</A> - with improved product=20
search</BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_000E_01C38A41.78851200--