[Az-Geocaching] cheater/not cheater
Andrew Ayre
listserv@azgeocaching.com
Wed, 28 May 2003 15:29:57 -0700
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0011_01C3252D.FF0E2920
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I assumed (and still do) that Gale was referring to the next entry which
indicates this person went caching with someone else. Gale - is that right?
Andy
-----Original Message-----
From: az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com
[mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com]On Behalf Of RAND
HARDIN
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 3:07 PM
To: AZ-Geocaching
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] cheater/not cheater
Gale,
Just because a person states "Nice location!" on the cache page doesn't
mean that the individual found the cache. In the case of the cache that you
reference, I could look at the map and determine the cache is located in a
"nice location."
It's also possible the individual may be driving to/past the caches
without actually finding them, but is claiming them as a virtual.
I believe it's understood that a log book/sheet must be signed at the
cache location to claim a find on the web page (unless the cache is actually
a virtual and/or has other rules for claiming a find). I have no objection
to a cache owner deleting an entry if there is no proof that the individual
actually found the cache. If there is a question from a cache owner, an
email to the individual asking to explain where and how the cache was found
and/or asking for a description of the cache should clear up some doubt.
Rand
----- Original Message -----
From: gale 'Desert Viking'
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 2:10 PM
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
Subject: [Az-Geocaching] cheater/not cheater
If this is the person you are referring to, check out this log entry for
Feb/2002.
http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=10655&log=y&decrypt=
There's another one I remember seeing that may exhonerate him. I'm still
looking for it.
------=_NextPart_000_0011_01C3252D.FF0E2920
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY=20
style=3D"BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; BORDER-TOP: medium none; FONT: 10pt =
verdana; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none">
<DIV><SPAN class=3D602302822-28052003><FONT face=3Dverdana>I assumed =
(and still do)=20
that Gale was referring to the next entry which indicates this =
person went=20
caching with someone else. Gale - is that right?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3Dverdana></FONT> </DIV>
<P>Andy<BR><BR> </P>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr style=3D"MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><FONT=20
face=3DTahoma>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>=20
az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com=20
[mailto:az-geocaching-admin@listserv.azgeocaching.com]<B>On Behalf Of =
</B>RAND=20
HARDIN<BR><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, May 28, 2003 3:07 PM<BR><B>To:</B>=20
AZ-Geocaching<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Az-Geocaching] cheater/not=20
cheater<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV>Gale,</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Just because a person states "Nice location!" on the =
cache=20
page doesn't mean that the individual found the cache. In =
the case=20
of the cache that you reference, I could look at the map and determine =
the=20
cache is located in a "nice location."</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>It's also possible the individual may be driving to/past the =
caches=20
without actually finding them, but is claiming them as a =
virtual.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I believe it's understood that a log book/sheet must be signed at =
the cache location to claim a find on the web =
page (unless the=20
cache is actually a virtual and/or has other rules for claiming a =
find). =20
I have no objection to a cache owner deleting an entry if there is no =
proof=20
that the individual actually found the cache. If there is a =
question from a cache owner, an email to the individual asking to =
explain=20
where and how the cache was found and/or asking for a description of =
the cache=20
should clear up some doubt.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Rand </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial">----- Original Message -----</DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt Arial; COLOR: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
gale 'Desert Viking'</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial"><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, May 28, 2003 =
2:10=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial"><B>To:</B> =
listserv@azgeocaching.com</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt Arial"><B>Subject:</B> [Az-Geocaching] =
cheater/not=20
cheater</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV></DIV>If this is the person you are referring to, check out =
this log=20
entry for Feb/2002. <A=20
=
href=3D"http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=3D10655&=
log=3Dy&decrypt">http://www.geocaching.com/seek/cache_details.aspx?ID=
=3D10655&log=3Dy&decrypt</A>=3D=20
There's another one I remember seeing that may exhonerate him. I'm =
still=20
looking for it.<BR><BR>
<DIV></DIV></DIV><BR =
clear=3Dall></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0011_01C3252D.FF0E2920--