[Az-Geocaching] I will never remove a legitimate Find log
Ken Akerman
listserv@azgeocaching.com
Thu, 8 May 2003 23:05:24 -0700 (PDT)
--0-1402404392-1052460324=:22931
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Thank you, Regan, for your note. I will never delete a log entry that someone has entered, except for such reasons as: the cacher reports a find log when they did not find the cache. the cacher did not satisfy the cache requirements (i.e. a person who goes to one of my museum caches in the Phoenix area who does not enter the museum).A duplicate log entry (I'll keep the first one).
For my museum caches, I am not too rigid about claiming credit. If you get four out of six questions but are having trouble finding one or two, then don't spend too much time looking for the obscure information. Just enjoy your time at the museum and look for interesting things that I or others may not have noticed.. Also, if you find an exhibit that would provide a topic for a good question, then please suggest it to me. I may add that question or replace one of the others. I intend to keep most of my traditional caches Members Only (especially until the Cache Pirate goes away), but I may periodically remove the Members Only designation on some of my caches for a weekend or so, particularly if a cache hasn't been visited in a while. I know that Members Only designation won't prevent the cache from being removed by determined land managers, but it can help prevent a few undesirable visits by cache pirates, thieves, and plunders. I've never had a cache lost due to a pirate's plunder, theft by an unscrupulous visitor to Geocaching.com, or a mischevious person who finds it accidentally, so I intend to keep it that way. Look for my ammo can from Thompson Peak to reappear at another location (likely in cache-friendly State Trust land) within the next week. Ken (a.k.a. Highpointer)
--0-1402404392-1052460324=:22931
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<DIV>Thank you, Regan, for your note. I will <U>never</U> delete a log entry that someone has entered, except for such reasons as:</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><IMG src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/tsmileys2/39.gif"> the cacher reports a find log when they did not find the cache.</DIV>
<DIV><IMG src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/tsmileys2/39.gif"> the cacher did not satisfy the cache requirements (i.e. a person who goes to one of my museum caches in the Phoenix area who does not enter the museum).</DIV>
<DIV><IMG src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/tsmileys2/39.gif">A duplicate log entry (I'll keep the first one).</DIV>
<DIV><BR>For my museum caches, I am not too rigid about claiming credit. If you get four out of six questions but are having trouble finding one or two, then don't spend too much time looking for the obscure information. Just enjoy your time at the museum and look for interesting things that I or others may not have noticed.. Also, if you find an exhibit that would provide a topic for a good question, then please suggest it to me. I may add that question or replace one of the others.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I intend to keep most of my traditional caches Members Only (especially until the Cache Pirate goes away), but I may periodically remove the Members Only designation on some of my caches for a weekend or so, particularly if a cache hasn't been visited in a while. I know that Members Only designation won't prevent the cache from being removed by determined land managers, but it can help prevent a few undesirable visits by cache pirates, thieves, and plunders. I've never had a cache lost due to a pirate's plunder, theft by an unscrupulous visitor to Geocaching.com, or a mischevious person who finds it accidentally, so I intend to keep it that way.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Look for my ammo can from Thompson Peak to reappear at another location (likely in cache-friendly State Trust land) within the next week.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><STRONG>Ken</STRONG> (a.k.a. <STRONG><EM>Highpointer</EM></STRONG>) </DIV>
--0-1402404392-1052460324=:22931--