[Az-Geocaching] How are AZ caches determined?

Bill Tomlinson listserv@azgeocaching.com
Sat, 15 Mar 2003 18:36:18 -0700


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0094_01C2EB21.C522DE40
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I found an out situation that appears to be an azgeocaching bug.  Am I
missing something?  TheWebbman and I did a Tucson run yesterday.  We hit =
44
caches in total, including a couple along the interstate between Phoenix =
and
Tucson as well as a few in the West valley.  Here are the two oddities I
noted.  First, all of the caches are in Arizona.  Most are traditional =
with
a few being virtual, but all have physical coordinates well within AZ.  =
Even
so, some were marked as out of state on azgeocaching.  Odder still, even
though we hit all of the same caches, four of mine were tagged as out of
state, while five were so marked for TheWebbman.  Doesn't makes sense.  =
I
haven't yet compared the lists to see which caches didn't make the AZ =
site.
=20
Does anyone have any thoughts?

------=_NextPart_000_0094_01C2EB21.C522DE40
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<TITLE>Message</TITLE>

<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1141" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D018062701-16032003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>I=20
found an out situation that appears to be an azgeocaching =
bug.&nbsp;&nbsp;Am I=20
missing&nbsp;something?&nbsp; TheWebbman and I did a Tucson run =
yesterday.&nbsp;=20
We hit 44 caches in total, including a couple along the interstate =
between=20
Phoenix and Tucson as well as a few in the West valley.&nbsp; Here are =
the two=20
oddities I noted.&nbsp; First, all of the caches are in Arizona.&nbsp; =
Most are=20
traditional with a few being virtual, but all have physical coordinates =
well=20
within AZ.&nbsp; Even so, some were marked as out of state on=20
azgeocaching.&nbsp; Odder still, even though we hit all of the same =
caches, four=20
of mine were tagged as out of state, while five were so marked for=20
TheWebbman.&nbsp; Doesn't makes sense.&nbsp; I haven't yet compared the =
lists to=20
see which caches didn't make the AZ site.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D018062701-16032003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =

size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=3D018062701-16032003><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#0000ff =
size=3D2>Does=20
anyone have any thoughts?</FONT></SPAN></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0094_01C2EB21.C522DE40--