[Az-Geocaching] Munged stats?
Brian Casteel
listserv@azgeocaching.com
Fri, 8 Aug 2003 10:16:03 -0700
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0370_01C35D96.12E2D900
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yikes. A few days ago, I had 19 out of state finds, with the 424 =
in-state finds. Suddenly, a portion of Arizona appears to have been =
annexed to another state as 51 caches now appear OOS. Any ideas?
Brian
Team A.I.
------=_NextPart_000_0370_01C35D96.12E2D900
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1170" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Yikes. A few days ago, I had 19 =
out of state=20
finds, with the 424 in-state finds. Suddenly, a portion of Arizona =
appears=20
to have been annexed to another state as 51 caches now appear OOS. =
Any=20
ideas?</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Brian</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Team A.I.</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0370_01C35D96.12E2D900--