[Az-Geocaching] Dog Parks
Regan Smith
listserv@azgeocaching.com
Wed, 2 Apr 2003 07:04:45 -0700
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C2F8E6.2440FAC0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Well I'll say this, I without the assistance of RTW, the Great Jackalope =
hunter, have come up with a new Urban Micro solution larger than the =
World Record caches but smaller than a Decon Container... I'll just use =
the Shot gun approach to getting all these Dog Parks caches approved =
:),,, alright maybe only one or two and a special one for Gidget's =
enjoyment.
Now what about that GPS jammer???=20
and I found two caches and saw 2 yellow jeeps thus leaving a balance of =
6 caches to find to break even.....
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Scott Wood=20
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com=20
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 4:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Dog Parks
At 04:27 PM 4/1/2003 -0700, you wrote:
What makes you think I don't want opinions?=20
Sorry, just got that impression.
IMHO it's about time the powers to be cracked down, being how there =
are a wide group of people who do the approving of the placed caches It =
depends on the person doing the approval....Then again why they went =
away from the GPS takes you to the Cache in the first place will remain =
a mystery...what good are rules if they are not enforced???=20
If I were in charge and made the rules, I would leave geocaching.com =
as a place to post waypoints. I wouldn't be in the business of =
determining if a cache is worth of existing. I can understand making =
sure that the cache pages are complete.
You are right, there is a real problem with having admins that can =
subjectively determine if a cache should be listed. I don't know what =
the answer is, but I suspect that we are going to see more and more =
rules as to what is allowed to be posted as a geocache. I just don't =
see this snowball being pushed back uphill.=20
In liberty,
Scott
wood@myblueheaven.com
www.myblueheaven.com
------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C2F8E6.2440FAC0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1141" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Well I'll say this, I without the =
assistance of=20
RTW, the Great Jackalope hunter, have come up with a new Urban Micro =
solution=20
larger than the World Record caches but smaller than a Decon =
Container... I'll=20
just use the Shot gun approach to getting all these Dog Parks caches =
approved=20
:),,, alright maybe only one or two and a special one for =
Gidget's=20
enjoyment.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Now what about that GPS jammer??? =
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>and I found two caches and saw 2 yellow =
jeeps thus=20
leaving a balance of 6 caches to find to break even.....</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
<A title=3Dwood@myblueheaven.com =
href=3D"mailto:wood@myblueheaven.com">Scott=20
Wood</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Dlistserv@azgeocaching.com=20
=
href=3D"mailto:listserv@azgeocaching.com">listserv@azgeocaching.com</A> =
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Tuesday, April 01, 2003 =
4:37=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Az-Geocaching] =
Dog=20
Parks</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>At 04:27 PM 4/1/2003 -0700, you wrote:<BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=3Dcite cite=3D"" type=3D"cite"><FONT face=3Darial =
size=3D2>What=20
makes you think I don't want opinions? =
</FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>Sorry, just got=20
that impression.<BR><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=3Dcite cite=3D"" type=3D"cite"><FONT face=3Darial =
size=3D2>IMHO it's=20
about time the powers to be cracked down, being how there are a wide =
group=20
of people who do the approving of the placed caches It depends on =
the person=20
doing the approval....Then again why they went away from the GPS =
takes you=20
to the Cache in the first place will remain a mystery...what good =
are rules=20
if they are not enforced??? </FONT><FONT =
face=3Darial></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>If=20
I were in charge and made the rules, I would leave geocaching.com as a =
place=20
to post waypoints. I wouldn't be in the business of determining =
if a=20
cache is worth of existing. I can understand making sure that =
the cache=20
pages are complete.<BR><BR>You are right, there is a real problem with =
having=20
admins that can subjectively determine if a cache should be =
listed. I=20
don't know what the answer is, but I suspect that we are going to see =
more and=20
more rules as to what is allowed to be posted as a geocache. I =
just=20
don't see this snowball being pushed back uphill. <BR><BR><BR>
<DIV>In liberty,</DIV><BR>
<DIV>Scott</DIV><BR>
<DIV>wood@myblueheaven.com</DIV>
<DIV><A href=3D"http://www.myblueheaven.com/"=20
=
EUDORA=3D"AUTOURL">www.myblueheaven.com</A></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HT=
ML>
------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C2F8E6.2440FAC0--