[Az-Geocaching] Is it OK to put travel bugs in caches that are visited infrequently or that are seasonally inaccessible?

[Scott Wood]

At 12:19 PM 10/28/2002 -0800, you wrote:

>Earlier in this forum, we discussed the hazards of putting a travel bug in 
>a cache that is very easy to find, and thus the cache may become lost with 
>the travel bug in it, resulting in permanent loss of the travel 
>bug.  However, what about putting travel bugs in caches that are difficult 
>to get to and thus are found very infrequently?  I have moved some of the 
>travel bugs that I have found in Arizona to caches in Utah, and right now 
>at least two of the travel bugs are located in difficult caches at high 
>elevations near Utah county high points.

Since I just posted the message about how frustrated I am with travel bugs 
in general, I wanted to reply to this one.

I can understand that a bug being put into a cache that is hard to get to 
can be upsetting.  One of mine ended up in the same hard cache TWICE.  All 
things being equal though, I would rather have it sitting in a hard cache 
than in the pack of a geocacher that for whatever reason decided to leave 
the game and never place it.  As long as it is in that hard cache there is 
still a chance that it will move.

I of course have lost all hope in travel bugs and will most likely just 
leave them in caches when I come across them.  I enjoy this game too much 
to spoil it with what appears to be increasing disappointment with the 
travel bug system.




Scott
Team My Blue Heaven
www.myblueheaven.com/geocache