[Az-Geocaching] The OASIS Cache

[listserv@azgeocaching.com]

Thank you. Let's please consider this subject closed.
Trisha

On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Scott Wood wrote:

> 
> At 10:55 AM 11/30/2002 -0800, you wrote:
> 
> >Scott,
> >
> >I already edited my log entry to make it less annoying and upsetting
> >for people like you. Many times I 'joke' in my logs, the original
> >intent of part of this log, but obviously that is lost on some
people
> >who are overly senstive to certain issues. I will be more careful in
> >the future to not upset you.
> 
> If I would have read your log as it now stands, I would have never
> posted 
> my first message.  It is much clearer now that you were close to the 
> gunfire and the possibility of getting shot was there.  It simply
> didn't 
> say that at first, and to come across with a message that you jus
> about got 
> shot didn't seem warranted in that light.  It is different with the
> clearer 
> picture in the logs.
> 
> 
> >There is a difference between hearing a bullet "zing" past you, and
> >hearing it hit a building. DUH. By the way, does "hunkered down"
mean
> >anything to you, like, for example, we thought the gunfire was
close??
> >Think!!
> 
> Now you are the one being insulting.  Yes, "hunkered down" means
> something, 
> it means hunkering down.  It doesn't mean  that gunfire was close. 
> Saying 
> that the gunfire was close means that the gunfire was close.
> 
> Please remember that this is a 2D medium that we are communicating
in,
> and 
> words mean things.  Humor and sarcasm don't translate well in e-mail.
> 
> >there, I am experienced and know what I am talking about, you did
call
> >me certain names or imply certain things, and I wait for an apology.
> 
> Again, I don't believe that I ever called you a name, but if you
> perceived 
> it that way, I am sorry, it wasn't meant as such.
> 
> >I will not get into a senseless debate with you when the facts are
SO
> >obvious, and I am sure all the people on this list don't want to
hear
> 
> Again, now that you have told more of the story, the facts are
> becoming 
> more and more clear, it just wasn't the case at first.
> 
> >If someone gets shot near that cache, accidently, they have been
> >warned.
> 
> It would be tragic if someone got shot at any cache.  We spent the
> entire 
> day in the Redington Pass area yesterday.  That area is very popular
> with 
> target shooters, and we heard gunshots everywhere we went.  I never
> felt 
> that I was about to get shot, but I never heard the bullets hit a
> building 
> next to me.  That would have been a different matter entirely.
> 
> Again, I apologize for the misunderstanding.
> 
> 
> In liberty,
> 
> Scott
> 
> wood@myblueheaven.com
> www.myblueheaven.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> listserv@azgeocaching.com
> <a
href="http://mail.brasher.com/jump/http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching">http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching</a>
> 
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> <a
href="http://mail.brasher.com/jump/http://www.azgeocaching.com">http://www.azgeocaching.com</a>


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Although no one can go back and
make a brand new start,
Anyone can start from now and
make a brand new ending."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~