[Az-Geocaching] azgeocaching.com stats

Koch, Dan listserv@azgeocaching.com
Tue, 16 Apr 2002 10:51:04 -0700


Ahhh.  That explains it.  Thanks for the explanation.  I thought it was just
me ;)

Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Poulter [mailto:polt@snaptek.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:36 AM
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] azgeocaching.com stats


this happens when a cache goes from active to being archived.... it ends 
up not getting crawled and the old data is still there until we move it 
over into the archived section so it can get updated differently....

i think it should be correct now

jason


Koch, Dan wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> Has anyone else noticed that the stats on azgeocaching.com sometimes
> incorrectly calculating the number of in-state vs. out-of-state finds?
> 
> For example, today I was admiring my new 100 find stats (thanks for the
> 'props' Hombres, RTW and CHUMP) and noticed that it was listed that I had
97
> in-state and 3 out-of-state finds.  I know that I only have 2 out-of-state
> finds so I checked the details.  For some reason, azgeocaching.com isn't
> counting the cache 'A Bridge To...' (GC4A46) as being in Arizona!  That
must
> really be a long bridge...  Strange part, though, is that it does list 'A
> Bridge To...' correctly for everyone else that has found it.
> 
> I've noticed this behavior before with other caches being considered
> out-of-state but just wanted to see if anyone else had.
> 
> Team LazyK - Dan
> _______________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> listserv@azgeocaching.com
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
> 
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com


_______________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list
listserv@azgeocaching.com
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching

Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com