--------------C66B3EBB3456D679F450EFC5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I'd say it's ok to log a find on your own cache as long as you are there for
maintenance purposes.
Cached-Away
Larry Farquhar wrote:
> Thought I'd stir up some more conversation and possibly a controversy.
>
> I have mixed feelings about this, and wondered what you thought. I've seen
> where a cacher logs a "find" for their own cache (a cache they hid). What do
> you think? Is this an acceptable practice or a no-no?
>
> BTW - can anyone (Jason) tell us how many people are on this list?
>
> Larry Farquhar
> Team "Wyle E"
> www.azjeeper.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list
> Az-Geocaching@listserv.snaptek.com
> http://listserv.snaptek.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
--------------C66B3EBB3456D679F450EFC5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
I'd say it's ok to log a find on your own cache as
long as you are there for maintenance purposes.
Cached-Away
Larry Farquhar wrote:
Thought I'd stir up some more conversation and possibly
a controversy.
I have mixed feelings about this, and wondered what you thought. I've
seen
where a cacher logs a "find" for their own cache (a cache they hid).
What do
you think? Is this an acceptable practice or a no-no?
BTW - can anyone (Jason) tell us how many people are on this list?
Larry Farquhar
Team "Wyle E"
www.azjeeper.com
_______________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list
Az-Geocaching@listserv.snaptek.com
http://listserv.snaptek.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
--------------C66B3EBB3456D679F450EFC5--