There are a couple things you could do: do some maintenance on the cache (put in a new log sheet) and log that with a note or you could put a "Needs Maintenance" note or "Needs Archived" log with an explanation why it should be archived. The reviewers might then decide to archive it.
It's great that you care though!
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 12:16 PM, J. Bell
<cqdmgycqd@yahoo.com> wrote:
Thanks for the clarification. I've noticed other caches marked as having been 'adopted' and thought that Groundspeak might have had some authority regarding abandoned caches. I guess I'll just wait to see if it ever gets archived (apparently the owners haven't been to geocaching.com since September of '08). I have no interest in appropriating their caching materials, so if it does get archived, I'll just add my own cache and push the damaged one slightly out of the way (and email the owners (again) regarding the new placement). I wasn't interested in any confrontation or in 'forcing' anyone to give me the cache - I thought perhaps there was a procedure in place to deal with abandoned caches. Thank you for setting me straight.
--- On Thu, 3/19/09, Moose Mob <moosemob@cox.net> wrote:
> From: Moose Mob <moosemob@cox.net>
> Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] Adopting a disabled cache
> To: listserv@azgeocaching.com, cqdmgycqd@yahoo.com
> Date: Thursday, March 19, 2009, 7:11 AM
> There are no more forced adoptions. Groundspeak doesn't
> own the container,
> so they have no authority to give it to you. If the cache
> owner doesn't give
> it to you, then you need to wait until it gets archived.
> You can place
> another cache in the same spot. If you happen to find
> useable cache
> materials in the place you put your cache, then that's
> between you and the
> person that left it there.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com
> [mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On
> Behalf Of J.
> Bell
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 11:40 PM
> To: az-geocaching@listserv.azgeocaching.com
> Subject: [Az-Geocaching] Adopting a disabled cache
>
>
> We're relatively new to the geocaching scene (started
> last August) and I was
> hoping someone could help me with a question. I've
> noticed that the Tucson
> cache "A Udall Micro" (GC1AQTA) has been disabled
> since December 10th due to
> a missing cap and an overflowing log. Cachers are still
> finding it and
> attempting to add their signatures despite the flag and
> since it's so close
> to home, I thought we would adopt it and install a new
> container/log. I'll
> email the cache owner directly, but I was wondering what
> the procedure was
> for adopting an apparently abandoned cache. Any help would
> be greatly
> appreciated. Thanks in advance and happy caching!
>
> Jennifer (aka ObiQuiet)
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
> To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
> http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
>
> Arizona's Geocaching Resource
> http://www.azgeocaching.com
____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching
Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com
--
~ Melinda
We don't see things as they are, we see them as we are.
~ Anais Nin