I think I must agree here that some things GC see as needing
heavy-handedness. They decided to archive one of my caches that I
temporally archived because I had not replaced it within 30 days. I
explained in a note that I was laid up with a serious leg injury and would get
to it asap. I don't think they read that but just acted on the flag on my
tempory archive. Which by the way must be fairly new as they threatened to
archive another of my caches when I temporally archived it over a year ago and
the flag just popped up. I found that I needed to post a different kind of
log other than just a note.
I still look after a couple of caches for away owner that are
close to me.
Anyway, we get a note whenever our caches are logged on line
and should act on the note if needed.
Jumping off box onto bad leg Ouch!!
Bob Smith, Team Petite Elite, Prescott, AZ
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 8:51
PM
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] New Fake
cache logger - FYI
Sorry, I have to disagree
If a cache owner can not
maintain a cache then it should be removed in my opinion. I agree with
groundspeak on this as only two things stop false logging.. 1 ) cache owner
confirms and removes fake logs 2 ) the cache goes bubye
So before
you point a finger at the Heavy Handed Groundspeak, maybe smack your fellow
cachers for being lazy and not caring?
= Dirk /
ShadowAce