Matt:
Well here is my two pennies worth.
As to Magellan who would want a GPS named after an Explorer that died on
route.
Garmin is the way to go. I started out with the ancient Garmin
38 where if I received
an accuracy of 40 feet I was tickled pink. Then I went on to a
Vista and that one
served me well over 5 years, and that is a lot of map work for the USFS in
addition to
caching.
Last year I went to the Legend HCX with maps and it works as well as the
best of
them out there, except Trimble. Go to the Garmin Website and
you can do a comparison
of the makes and models.
Cache on.
Tahosa - Treker of the San Tans
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2009 11:11
AM
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] need some
assistance...
Thanks to all who've replied.
Ok, so I understand we are
all on the same page that Garmin is the best and that in a perfect world, I
should get a 60CSx or better. No one is really answering the question I asked
though.
Anyone have any REAL actual experience with either of these 2
units?
If not, thats ok. I would just trust a review by an avid
cacher over one I found on a website somewhere unsolicited.
Again,
Thanks again to all who've responded.
--Matt of Team
AZSonburnt