I pointed it out in my log, then his (friend? family?) from Utah started posting on my caches about people (me) being nothing but a whiner and how this is a great imaginative idea.

Thats why I am wondering just how wrong I must have been if Utah cachers will post fake found logs on other caches to defend them.

On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Regan Smith <evilfish@cox.net> wrote:
what is the GC#?

Then again just like burried caches, way to many out there and how burried is burried? slightly covered ect.....

Wrong is wrong and the right thing to do is point it out and blame all the other cache loggers for not....

ShadowAce wrote:
Ok, this just strikes me as wrong, so I wondered what others think.

City park bench and the cache owner has removed a large dome nut from the bench.
They placed a very tiny piece of paper inside the dome nut and placed it back on.

To 'find and sign the cache' one must remove nuts from the city benches until you find the correct one.

Am I the only one who thinks parks and recreation might have a problem with caches such as this?




E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.0.0.386)
Database version: 5.11230
http://www.pctools.com/spyware-doctor-antivirus/
 

____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching

Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com





E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.0.0.386)
Database version: 5.11230
http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor-antivirus/

____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching

Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com