The new law regarding OHV ‘fees’
is still in the regulation development stage. Many ‘benefits’ were
promised in this bill (new trails, education, enforcement). The fees (estimated
to be $20 per OHV per year) will be implemented, but it’ll be years before
you see any new trails. Arizona Game and Fish has the lead agency
responsibility (and they love fee increases). They have new offices to build,
and new 4x4 full size trucks to drive around in…
What the new / increased fees will NOT
provide is any increase in benefit. These fees only equalize that which was
lost through state allocation decreases. That coupled with increased fuel and
labor costs (and the decrease in
While Bill in Wilcox is absolutely correct
in stating that the brunt of targeted costs should be borne by targeted users, TOO
many people in this state are getting a free ride, in one form or another.
There are too many mandated entitlements
in this state (health care, food assistance, housing, etc.) that have priority
over you enjoying the state’s ‘backyard’.
Bill in Tonopah
From:
az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com [mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com]
On Behalf Of Geocaching 7/01
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 7:32
AM
To:
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching]
Increase in
I wonder if any of this cost increase is part of the
off-road vehicle damage restoration effort, or will that be another increase in
the near future.
As I understand, a fishing or hunting license provides
permit to use state lands--expect that to change.
I agree with Bill, users should pay the bulk of the costs--I
hope this is a better model than the gas tax fund.