Because like the new team colors, I think
the name sucks. J
Brian
Team A.I.
From:
az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com
[mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of Regan Smith
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007
1:58 PM
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] so
much for trying to preserve a cache
It is chase field now so why not a new
cache with a old name/
From:
az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com
[mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of Gale
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007
12:16 PM
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] so
much for trying to preserve a cache
I dont get it. There was
no need to archive this cache. Someone else was willing to take it over. Unless
they want older caches to disappear and new caches to replace them so people
can hunt them instead of placing caches in "undesirable"(ie those
dreaded urban micros) locations. Thing is, I know we would get bored hunting
for new caches repeatedly placed in the same location.
We could have seen this coming back when Petite Elite attempted to
adopt All Aboard Gone up in Prescott.
I can't remember if the original owner was out of contact, but the logic was
that the container was missing, so the cache could only be un-archived to the
original owner, and not an adoptee.
I read something in the forums that hinted that archived caches will be taken
off the maps soon, so the only way you would be able to 'find' them would be by
knowing the waypoint ID, or perhaps by looking at someones found list.
Apparently 'cache permanence' is falling by the wayside, so stock up on
'Gladware' and just archive the cache and 'hide' a new one when the container
disintegrates.
Richard Daines wrote:
There have been several conversations on the forum about just this
topic and as predicted, this is the response. GC seems to lean to
archiving rather that adoption if the original owner doesn't get
involved. There is a similar cache here in Missouri that appears to have been quietly
adopted but is Disabled none the less. Unless the original owner speaks
up, I bet this one will be Disabled too regardless of it condition. I
guess I can see the point that a cache needs an owner, a point of
contact. Having to apply for a new cache at the location
seems extreme but this is how GC tries to have control.
Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet
in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more.