Ookay then.  Again, I don’t know why you’re taking such offense when (I’ll state it again) that it was posted to gauge interest.  I responded with what I thought was a level-headed dialogue to explain the reasons that came out of the whole concept once Jake decided to look at turning it into a coin.  Rather than maintaining a cool dialogue about this, you’re frankly being a smart-ass for no apparent reason.  Of course you’re entitled to your opinion, as are all others who subscribe here.  To me, it came across as an attack on Jake and I for having the nerve to work together on a design that we thought was a good one for representing CITO.

 

Jared responded just before you, and frankly I took his response as an opinion and not a criticism.  There were things he didn’t like and identified them.  I don’t feel your response was anything close to what could be defined as an opinion, but rather what I stated I felt it was already.

 

Brian

Team A.I.

 

 

 

 

Chopping this down at the request of others on the list...


"The Arizona CITO Geocoin "

A one mile section of of the beeline highway was adopted by the Geocachers of Arizona. A Physical Geocache is located near the coordinates of the sign. C.I.T.O. Always N 33 29.705 W 111 48.280

 So this has nothing to do with you and I getting along, it is and was simply a statement that I do not feel this represents the STATE and of course I believed the original post was asking for opinions. I am sorry to have given an opinion that was other then 'This is Perfect, I will buy 100'

 Next time I wont respond when asked an opinion unless I think it is a wonderful perfect idea.