Yep, I knew I was missing something obvious.  Darn.  So, it’s actually 7 rows of 11 for 77 plus the 5 rows of 10 for 50 more, making 127.  by using 1 less in every other row, making triangles, you can put the rows closer together and get more rows.  The height of an equilateral triangle 528 feet on a side is 457.26 feet, approx.  Now, there may well be an even better packing method.  Who can beat 127?

 

Bill

 


From: az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com [mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of Loran Wilcox
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 10:03 PM
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com; bill@freeholder.com
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Major League Cacher and Cache Density

 

Looked at it again then its rows of 11 and 10

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Bill Nolan

To: listserv@azgeocaching.com

Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 11:49 PM

Subject: RE: [Az-Geocaching] Major League Cacher and Cache Density

 

Nope, 106 looks right.  10 in the first row, and then 9 in the second.  That means the second row can be 457.26 feet from the first.  Then alternate 10 and 9.  It looks like you would end up with 6 rows of 10 and 5 of 9 for 125, but you actually have room for a bit over 11.5 rows, so you can forget the triangles and make the last three rows all 10, so you end up with 7 rows of 10 and 4 of 9 for 106.  Of course, it’s late, and I’m probably missing something obvious or important, in which case, I’m sure someone will let me know soon….

 

Bill in Willcox.

 


From: az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com [mailto:az-geocaching-bounces@listserv.azgeocaching.com] On Behalf Of Loran Wilcox
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 9:40 PM
To: listserv@azgeocaching.com
Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Major League Cacher and Cache Density

 

I would believe 121

 

Team Sand Dollar

----- Original Message -----

From: David Thompsen

To: listserv@azgeocaching.com

Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2005 11:25 PM

Subject: Re: [Az-Geocaching] Major League Cacher and Cache Density

 

I could fit at least 126 caches into a square mile without violating the 528 foot rule.... but maybe that's a puzzle cache for another day. :)

 

--Dave, The Cow Spots

 360 <team360usa@yahoo.com> wrote:

Just got this notification from my "O.K. Corral" cache listing:

 

This is an automated message from Geocaching.com

You are receiving this email because you are the owner of this listing.

Location: Arizona, United States
TadCooler found O.K. CORRAL (Virtual Cache) at 3/13/2005

Log Date: 3/13/2005
Had fun in Tombstone while in Arizona for spring training.  Thanks.

 

Hmmmm. Maybe we have a celebrity major league cacher out there...

 

Also, did you know?-

The maximum number of caches you can fit in a square mile is 100? Well, that is IF GC.com actually stuck to their .1 "ahem"..."guideline".

 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com ____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching

Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com


Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!


____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching

Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com


____________________________________________________________
Az-Geocaching mailing list listserv@azgeocaching.com
To edit your setting, subscribe or unsubscribe visit:
http://listserv.azgeocaching.com/mailman/listinfo/az-geocaching

Arizona's Geocaching Resource
http://www.azgeocaching.com